Mid-year PMPs are around the corner. I've heard HR really want more 'Expects More' ratings this year. How are the sentiments? What are you hearing from your supervisors or Leadership?
Is it going to be the next big HR drive just like forcing hybrid work through data and dashboard?
21 replies (most recent on top)
I got 2VC and two Exceeds last year and now a expects more with 3 VCs in mid-year PMP. I want to complaint to HR. Does anyone has any success in reaching out to HR or Ombuds?
Be glad. A bell curve where the majority are hidden in the middle is way better than forced ranking in 5 categories with a required group % that are PIP’ed in the bottom and salaries tied to the category.
I'm a supervisor and I've been instructed to be strict on ratings this year. Has anyone else getting similar guidance from your Management
Definitely, more 'Expects More' in IT Engineering as AG is preparing for layoffs. Skill assessment is another tool they will use to identify people to be fired
Ok, Ok, I will do my share to help fill the “expects more” quota! Always giving to the cause….
Always good for the “ins” and going through the motions for the “outs”. Bout sums that up….
It should be clear to every Chevron employee that PMP and whatever personal performance scheme HR comes up with (or more correctly, what some consultant told them to use) is all for the benefit of management. Promotions of the favored, career stalling of the whiners and unfavored demographics, layoffs of the troublemakers, they're all rooted in these laughable "performance metrics". For those not in any of those 3 categories, just play along, fill in whatever your boss tells you to put in, and cross off another year before retirement. For the youngsters, spend more time fine-tuning your resume rather than your PMP. Your PMP gets you nowhere, your resume gets you hired somewhere else.
The new ratings are the biggest distractions, artery, subjective BS that HR has ever come up with in the history of HR
Agree with @2yot. We're being prepped for layoffs next year.
After being told I maybe eligible for a psg increase next year after 15 exceeds and 1 VC in the last 4 years I don't think it matters much.
This whole process is a facade it forces the vast majority into the middle. You can't tell whether you're improving or able to compare yourself against anyone else. The HiPots and DEI candidates will continue to get the best ratings. It's a bad joke.
Definitely. Why did we get rid of the old system? Because Feedback!
Sounds like HR s gearing up for layoffs and will use the PMP's to assist in that task.
Who cares? The ratings do not drive the budget for the team, and there does not have to be correlation between ratings and salary change…all discretionary by supervisor.
Only three performance ratings per category is a bad design. They should have kept 5 ratings like old system.
Meets Expectations is the new Expects More.
Yep. Supposedly my BU had zero percent expects more or something close to it. It’s BS
Remember that MW and company said the new system is what the employees asked for. LOL
I’d be in favor of no performance ratings, but more frequent feedback sessions/dialogue. Here’s your merit % increase and your CIP at EOY. Done.
I expects more of HR.
The company is falling apart due to our management's greed. We need new leadership now!