One again, geozones are COST OF LABOR based, not cost of living.
I know most of you really struggle with reading comprehension, so here’s a little help for the special ones that keep spouting off which city is more expensive, etc…
Definitions
Cost of living refers to the amount of money a consumer needs to maintain an acceptable standard of living in a specific geographic area. This number is tied to the Consumer Price Index (CPI), and reflects the combined price of food, housing, groceries, transportation, taxes, health services and entertainment.
Cost of labor refers to the cost to hire and retain employees with the education and skills to do a job in a specific industry and geographic location. This calculation is impacted by the availability of talent as well as the “going rate” paid to that talent in a particular geographic market. The cost varies, based on supply and demand.
Which is greater: Cost of living or cost of labor?
The real answer to this question is: it depends. Cost-of-living rates can be far greater than cost of labor, depending on the city. For example, in Boston, New York and San Francisco, cost of living frequently outpaces cost of labor. The difference between the two costs can be attributed to the desirability of these cities. Lots of people live there, which increases the demand for housing, food, entertainment, and all of the other essentials. So, prices for these items follow suit.
It’s also possible that cost-of-living rates can be lower than cost-of-labor rates in particular areas. For example, oil and gas companies are often located in more rural areas, where cost of living is low, but have a lower talent pool to choose from. So, these companies have to pay more to get the talent they need, even when the cost of living in these areas is well below national averages.
Source
https://www.payscale.com/compensation-trends/know-difference-cost-labor-cost-living/