Thread regarding AT&T layoffs

U R NEXT

Stankey is notoriously enthusiastic about cutting jobs in the way Apple CEO Tim Cook is about squeezing Chinese suppliers on costs. Back in 2015, before Stankey was boss, AT&T employed a grand total of 281,000 people, according to its annual report filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission. And this was before its $85 billion move for Time Warner, one of the worst deals of the century. After offloading that business, AT&T finished March this year with 157,800 employees.

In other words, it has cut 123,650 jobs, or 44% of its workforce, in about seven years. This is only 5,717 fewer jobs than BT, Deutsche Telekom (excluding employees at its US division), Orange, Telecom Italia, Telefónica and Vodafone have cut in total over the same period. And AT&T is not some unique US case. Verizon, the other one of the big three US telcos, has removed 60,600 positions since 2015, equal to roughly a third of its workforce at the end of that year.

by
| 2446 views | | 9 replies (last July 7, 2023) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+1nu3RgQE

9 replies (most recent on top)

Stankey is a DB, even he knows this, but he is in the cat bird seat an doesn't care.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1szm+1nu3RgQE

That reminds me of the old adage…”you can’t be first, but you can be NEXT!”

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @nix+1nu3RgQE

To Post ID: @tki+1nu3RgQE, You hit the nail on the head. Stankey is a big part of past failures and there is no reason to believe he will succeed in the future. His recent RTO policy shows how out of touch he is with the operations work processes. He is a bad nightmare that won't go away

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @byx+1nu3RgQE

AT&T is shedding employees like a snake sheds it skin. Despite all of the tax breaks and government subsidies AT&T squandered every penny on failed deals and executive perks and failed three costly M&A deals. There are thousands of retirees at the SVP level and above still receiving millions in payments and special benefits. Stankey in maneuvering the company for sale, either piecemeal or as a whole. He stands to make tens on millions on a change of control deal. Randall will indirectly benefit by cashing in his stock.

AT&T has been an orphan company since it was broken up. All of its leaders have been from within and had really no innovative vision. The last innovation was it stumbled into the iPhone exclusivity deal. Even that deal favored Apple because AT&T had to pay for the phones up front, and Apple just kept cranking out new versions.

AT&T turned Apple into a powerhouse and got left behind.

A used car salesman could run AT&T better than Stankey!!!

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @tki+1nu3RgQE

I see it from both sides. Company can’t get rid of excess union employees very easily, especially lazy ones and the union folks are protected, so why should they leave. There has to be a balance at some point because it does hurt younger union employees and the company too.
If were running the show, it would be a buyout with no backfill on the union side. This would be a fair way to move forward for both sides.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @zhf+1nu3RgQE

Part of the problem is old people who have 40 plus years who dont retire!

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @tee+1nu3RgQE

a lot has happened since 2015. Your numbers do not tell the whole story.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @rjg+1nu3RgQE

Bummer ~

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @shq+1nu3RgQE

I support this. Can’t get rid of individuals and can’t discipline individuals because of retaliation and claims of discrimination. So why not get rid of a group to just get rid of a few? Welcome to this era of woke.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @ung+1nu3RgQE

awesome future ahead!

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @sqp+1nu3RgQE

Post a reply

: