Thread regarding AT&T layoffs

How to syphon 42B through Investment redistribution

Back in 2011 AT&T Didn't Want To Expand Rural Coverage Because Of $3.8 Billion Price Tag, now they are getting a big pie of 42B, thanks to high energy Binden.

by
| 924 views | | 6 replies (last June 28, 2023) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+1nkJjkph

6 replies (most recent on top)

Don’t be surprised if that money goes to the Blackrock/T partnership.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1axl+1nkJjkph

Remember U- Verse? This scam cost 23B and was never fully deployed.

Remember the MDU fiber project, AKA fiber to nowhere? AT&T connected every section 8 apartment complex it could find in order meet "units" passed with fiber. Did we gain any fiber customers from that. No, we did not.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1hqk+1nkJjkph

Remember U- Verse? This scam cost 23B and was never fully deployed.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @udj+1nkJjkph

How is this a bad thing?

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @erd+1nkJjkph

It's has become a welfare company that cannot exist without government support. This is the reason they don't care about debt or success of the company.
They will win either way because the government will just give them more money in the form of bogus contracts. I'm sure Randy, John, and all their cronies made billions in some kinda back door scheme with their failed acquisitions. Too big to fail.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @hvj+1nkJjkph

https://www.businessinsider.com/leaked-att-didnt-want-to-expand-rural-coverage-because-of-38-billion-price-tag-2011-8?amp

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @qxr+1nkJjkph

Post a reply

: