Wouldn’t you think the EPA would be involved? There’s absolutely nothing regarding lead cable investigations made by the EPA. I’m sure Verizon & AT&T will sue all parties involved with this assumption.
9 replies (most recent on top)
Sue a company that buys ink by the truckload? You're funny johnny. That would be yet another total waste of att time, effort, and money. So I can see exactly why you like that idea. Bozo.
So long as they have the evidence to back up their story, then there is nothing to sue over. If they reported a malicious fallacy, then yes, they could be subject to a lawsuit. Most papers have a decent editing staff that keeps the paper out of the courtroom.
It’s called free press. WSJ leans conservative and they’re calling big telecom out. If they were all about only propping business up, there would be no issue. Instead, maybe there’s a legitimate health hazard backed up by science and data. If you don’t think it’s an issue, I’d suggest you to drink a glass of their lead water.
Not at all. They reported their findings nothing to sue them over. Just because you don’t like what they found does not mean that you can sue them.
Consider this company's involvement with CNN, being the victim of irresponsible media coverage is karma.
Your statement: Sue because of an opinion?? I think you are an id io T
Sue me
you have faith/trust in the EPA??
Watch Dark Waters..(true story)… then google PFOAS /PFA and see how long it took for the govt to do ANYTHING .
EPA is underfunded just like OSHA
They won’t sue!!! that will open up the gates for WSJ to get internal documents on the issue!