Thread regarding Wells Fargo & Co. layoffs

I wish they was a forum to inform shareholders about the truth of Wells Fargo from the inside POV…

Shareholders deserve the objective facts, without the PR spin, as do our customers and regulators. They are only hearing Charlie Scharf’s misleading public statements, which often embellish and obscure the truth:

  • “We are making a significant amount of progress.”
  • “We are working hard to transform our institution while supporting our customers, employees and the communities we serve.”
  • “We are laser-focused on meeting the expectations of our regulators.”
  • “We have very high standards as we go forward and complete this work.”
  • “We are one cohesive group. There is a candor that didn’t exist at the company before.”
  • “We are not significantly pulling back in any of our businesses.”
  • “Employees are out most valuable resource and a key competitive advantage.”
  • “We are customer-centric in how we approach our products and services.”

Shareholders deserve to know the truth about why they have endured a 26% share price loss from investing in the stock 5 years ago. This is after Charlie has thrown $65 Billion at the problem in a failed attempt to support the stock price Dividends are still half of what they used to be. Leadership at the top is unstable. American jobs are being offshored, potentially placing customer financial data at an increased risk. Expenses are being cut which puts our long-term prospects at risk. Many practices and products are for the good of the bank, not for the good of the customer. We can all point to questionable practices where leadership is looking the other way. Mediocrity is the new norm, excellence is out the window.

The public deserves the truth.

by
| 1467 views | | 14 replies (last April 12, 2023) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+1m5M52O4

14 replies (most recent on top)

WF is and always is a long term play. We are in the sh_t right now and as usual you get everyone being so emotional and reactive. Stay your course, ignore the noise and if you need to, sell.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1hpo+1m5M52O4

@1nlh+1m5M52O4 take it easy there wage-slave. Sure, WF stock has barely changed over the last 2 years, but then again nor have any other bank stocks. But at least it's not FRC or SVB.

So be a good boy and report to your HR partner and take your free WFH-forevah prize.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1jrc+1m5M52O4

Post ID: @1dgx+1m5M52O4

Hey Dummy!

The point of the post is that your investment is not safe. As a WFC shareholder, you have lost money.

I would recommend laying off those with low reading comprehension skills.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1nlh+1m5M52O4

Post ID: @twa+1m5M52O4
Who said anything about employee happiness? And the ROI is $hit.
But glad you put your 2 cents worth out there!

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1xgo+1m5M52O4

As a customer and shareholder I don't really give a damn about a random employee's opinion. I care that
(a) my money is safe
(b) my investment is safe.

Other than that ... lay all the complainers off already.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1dgx+1m5M52O4

The biggest majority of shareholders are institutional investors. They care about ROI and nothing more. Employee happiness is at odds with ROI maximization.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @twa+1m5M52O4

Very myopic to think shareholders would want or need to consider employees' opinions. Might need a little more real world experience and consider making adjustments accordingly.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @kdt+1m5M52O4

The truth is we need more layoffs and more red tape deduction

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @gju+1m5M52O4

As a shareholder I agree!

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @qbf+1m5M52O4

RCSA is failing as managers have no clue what their controls or procedures are, RTO is chasing away quality employees and candidates, executive leadership lies and continues to lie, the congressional hearings where CS attended was lies....bank is now trying to influence brokerage through their "COEs" and it will lead to more regulatory findings as they try to blur the line between bank customers and brokerage customers

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @hnp+1m5M52O4

How about Do we anticipate loss of talent or institutional knowledge due to misguided RTO initiatives?

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @kqi+1m5M52O4

I’m aware of MNPI. Anything I have to say would be available to anyone who takes the time to ask and answer the right questions. Anyone with a bs radar.

What are the real reasons why Wells Fargo pushes Asset Management so hard?

Who has really benefited from our Corporate Stock Buybacks?

How many American jobs has WFC eliminated due to offshoring? What are the risks of offshoring financial-related jobs, data and programming to third- world countries?

Why are we under the Federal Asset Cap 5 years later? Exactly what steps have been taken and what is the projected ETA?

What changes have been made which are not benefitting our customers? Not benefiting our shareholders?

How does aggressive cost cutting affect our customer service as well as our ability to complete the regulatory work?

Why such instability in the upper ranks?

How does the culture affect productivity, the ability to attract and retain talent, customer service and profits.

How does the spread in each job’s salary range cover up the truth about the inequality and biases in how employees are paid?

There are an exhaustive range of topics to be explored.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @iau+1m5M52O4

So the random guy on the internet needs to be that spokesperson?

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @omm+1m5M52O4

What do you plan to tell them? It appears by your post you know it all, so you know that reporting anything that is MNPI is going to land you in the unemployment line.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @qbe+1m5M52O4

Post a reply

: