Thread regarding AT&T layoffs

Stankey cost AT&T $106 billion!!

Stankey cost the company $100+ billion over his career.

Here are the smart business decisions he made:
Bought DirectTV for $67 billion in 2015
Bought WarnerMedia for $108 billion in 2018
Sold WarnerMedia for $43 billion in 2022
Sold DirectTV for $26 billion in 2025
Net loss over these deals is $106 billion

Here is what we should have bought:
T-Mobile in 2015 for $45 billion in 2015
Level 3 Communications for $34 billion in 2016
CenturyLink for $55 billion in 2016
DISH Network for $35 billion in 2017
Net valuation gain would be $182 billion for AT&T.

This would have moved AT&T’s spot on the Fortune 100 to the top 10 and position us alongside companies like Alphabet and Microsoft. Current we are ranked 32. Our employee headcount would have increased to 240,000 instead of the current 133,000 and the 80,000 target. AT&T would have likely be the #1 U.S. wireless carrier instead of being #3 behind T-Mobile and Verizon. Our share price would have been roughly $45 instead of $22.

Stankey talks a big game. He says that our #1 priority is fiber investment and convergence. That he wants to make AT&T market based. But he never tells you what AT&T could or should have been if he and Randall did not ruin it. When confronted with any serious question at a town hall he deflects with “convergence” or “fiber investment”.

I have been in Texas my whole life and I know a con when I see one. We call that “big hat no cattle”.


by
| 1 view | | 10 replies (last 1 day ago) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+1kvrrr5bz

10 replies (most recent on top)

This fails to capture the growth the company would have enjoyed had the past 2 CEOs simply done nothing in M&A. The number is a lot bigger than $106 billion. I would estimate at least double.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @e5+1kvrrr5bz

How are we still here?

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @dk+1kvrrr5bz

Cook the books.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @dj+1kvrrr5bz

If Stink simply did the opposite of what he thought was best we would be #1 out of 3 instead of #3 out of 3. He’s a proven loser and fading himself would actually be beneficial. He should give it a try.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @dh+1kvrrr5bz

@d3 yeah? When?.. it’s been 6 years and all he’s done is continue to destroy value and crater the stock. R u restarted?

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @dg+1kvrrr5bz

Remember when Costanza decided to do the exact opposite of his natural instinct?

Stanky should go with chicken salad on rye, untoasted today.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @d4+1kvrrr5bz

Stankey will make AT&T great again.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @d3+1kvrrr5bz

Don’t forget to add his bloated salary and bonus over that same period of time. Only guy in the world who’s compensated that well for such a poor shareholder return

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @d1+1kvrrr5bz

Giving TMobile a shot of Narcan and a stint in rehab allowed them to go hard after both ATT and Verizon. At a minimum Stankey cost shareholders $200B with all his follies. The guy who just sold Time Warner David Zaslav knew he had a fat turkey with Stankey that he could pluck and take to the farmers market and make bank. SBC was a culture of Cement Head Bulldozers. Stankey led the way.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @cq+1kvrrr5bz

Don’t forget about $5B CASH and Spectrum we had to give to TMob as a poison pill when the deal didn’t go through. King Stink and Randall literally revived a dead competitor and gave them what they needed to ki-l us.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @cp+1kvrrr5bz

Post a reply

: