Did they change how it’s tracked? Before I recall them just caring about the 8 week average, do they care about weekly average now?
If I go all 5 days this week, and next week I go in once, wouldn’t my weekly average be 3? Or do I need to go in 3 times a week to avoid any complaints or issues?
Dang. One would think someone who works in financial services can do basic Math for a rolling average of 4, 8, or 52 weeks.
And if you can't build a simple spreadsheet to track it like I and several others have done. That way you can forecast your vacation or sick days in advance and play catch-up.
It's not that hard people, we've been doing it for several years now.
@fv To avoid any potential discussion, your 4, 8, and 12 month need to be 3.0 or better. Once the 5 drops off, you'll need to average 3.67 each of the next 3 weeks after the "1" week for that 4 week average to be 3.0. That's 11 trips, minimum, over the following 3 weeks. Or as "b3" said, just go in 3 or more days per week, and you won't have to worry about it.
So in this case if I went 5 last week, go one next week, then the following week I need to go in at least 4 days?
Why not just go in 3 days and spend less time worrying about how it’s tracked?
It’s a rolling average, so your four week average and eight week average would take a hit due to your hypothetical scenario of you went 5, then 1, then just did the normal 3 days.
It’s so silly that they spend this much effort being our nanny