Most of the impact was at levels 40 and below. What exactly was the intent of the layoffs- reduce management layers, reduce friction between the teams by consolidating under same management, reduce the operating costs by targeting the high cost roles.
None nada, instead what we got was most of the impact on levels actually delivering output and working. But now we have teams with most people at senior manager, principal, director levels and no one to actually work on the deliverables.
Was the leadership smoking weed when deciding on impacted roles?