Thread regarding U.S. Bank layoffs

Enterprise Architecture used to be boxes and arrows nobody followed.

Now it’s the same thing… just with “AI” copy-pasted on every slide.
Principal Architects running the show, somehow always in the room, rarely in the outcome.
They don’t build.
They don’t run.
But they definitely “align.”
Every problem gets a framework.
Every framework gets a deck.
Every deck gets approved.
Nothing actually gets better.
“Agentic systems,” “AI platforms,” “north star”, all discussed at length, all safely far from production.
Decisions sound big.
Ownership stays small.
Meanwhile, teams that ship are rewriting the plan in real time just to get something out the door.
At this point, the architecture isn’t enabling delivery, it’s something delivery has to survive.
But sure… one more review, one more workshop, one more “AI strategy” session.
That’ll fix it.


by
| 1 view | | 5 replies (last April 28) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+1kq40bvb1

5 replies (most recent on top)

In our org, becoming an AI leader requires zero AI, zero engineering depth, and maximum confidence. Impressive standards.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @jw+1kq40bvb1

We’ve successfully reinvented engineering:

Chief Architects who don’t architect

Principal Engineers who manage people

Leadership layers optimized for meetings, not outcomes

Honestly, the only thing scaling here is confusion.

Everyone is now an ‘AI leader’ - which is fascinating.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @jv+1kq40bvb1

EA is a mirage other than clearpath compliance ( mostly driven by risk) not seen any value from them.
Expect them to recreate discover(CHI) team here and struggling to understand the businesses which are not cards/payment.
Frameworks are supposed to be reused for similar problems. They produce ppt, it’s not even close to a framework .

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @gm+1kq40bvb1

A pattern worth questioning: architecture leadership cycles where momentum stalls for a year, then gets reset with familiar hires from prior orgs.

Instead of building continuity and accelerating delivery, we end up rebuilding influence networks and rediscovering the same structures under new branding.

Across the board, it raises a simple question, are we optimizing for system outcomes, or for organizational familiarity?

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @gc+1kq40bvb1

Take a look at Paul’s org under architecture leadership, if this is the blueprint, it’s a masterclass in turning simple problems into complex ones while delivery slows to a crawl.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @gb+1kq40bvb1

Post a reply

: