No. Its used to fire people. No severance. No unemployment.
9 replies (most recent on top)
Dear Lord, the bootlicking in this thread. No one give a toss about the report. In fact, the most compliant are probably at the highest risk as they are only compliant because they know they are the worst performers. The only people on record as being let go for compliance were at ZERO compliance. Heck, getting surplused is a reward at this point. They want you to quit, not to have to surplus you. Ignoring their d-mb metrics and age discrimination mind games and just getting the job done for the customers and stockholders is beating them at their own game.
Why would I surplus the employees showing up???
Nope. It’s for getting rid of people they already wanted gone and needed a trap.
The presence report is a primary source for surplus decision. If not meeting office requirements or only completing a minimum of 40 hours, management employees are at risk.
It is the #1 thing they use for management, and they will initiate the surplus without any input from your L2 and L3 for non compliance with RTO.
For “regular” surplus, assuming everyone on your team is complying with RTO…it is absolutely your L2 and L3 that determine who goes (don’t let them try and tell you otherwise, which they will)
No.
Yes. It’s a pretty significant factor that often overrules team rankings. As it should be.
I hope so. I'm a tech and I'm never in the office. Always virtual when checking my workload. Surplus me beotches.