That's a rhetorical question, by the way.
8 replies (most recent on top)
The plan is suffering so you quit and they don’t pay severance.
It’s part of McKinsey training plan. Watch on YouTube about McKinsey, they laugh and celebrate when they recommend firm fire people. Their entire job is to make life miserable so you quit.
Remember, we are a liability on balance sheet and not an asset to the MC. We prevent them from their huge bonus and compensation
That stupid bi--h Gunjan and dum--ss Elcio have no intention of sorting anything out. They don't give a sh-t about how any of this impacts the employee's lives. They truly are vile trash. Karma is coming for you 2 a--holes.
They're not going to "sort out this RTO mess" because the goal isn't to sort it. The goal is to create enough discontent that a sufficient number of people voluntarily exit their employment.
If they do accidentally sort it out, then they'll quickly unsort it because that is their entire strategy right now.
We've seen several waves of this already. The goal isn't collaboration, or productivity, or anything like that. We had all of that before covid. The real reason is they want discontent, but they have to be careful. They'll continue slow-walking the bad news out because it's hard to predict the interplay between the employment market and psychological factors to get the numbers they want and they need to be careful they don't overshoot their target too much. So they'll turn the sc--ws a bit at a time until they achieve the goal.
They need pretext for layoffs. Here's an interesting wrinkle: the clown administration is attempting to require banks to collect citizenship information through KYC rules (to push non-citizens out of the banking system). The bank, with advice from McKinsey, is setting up a system to make laying us off without severance easier while they shift up to 5000 jobs to India. They'll be working for a bank that can't even have them as a customer. Make it make sense.
I was remote before covid, during covid but not now! Make it make sense. I am the only one on my team at the hub.
@a3 the way this is being handled absolutely blows my mind. They act like we didn't have hybrid work before COVID. I was a hybrid employee and two days a week was what our BL agreed upon. If we didn't make it those two days a week, we communicated why. It was a non-issue. People that didn't come in at all were handled via the standard HR process and everyone was fine.
People are bucking it so hard because they forced people who were remote before COVID into offices, and forced people who are the only person from their team into offices simply to have an a-s in a desk. They also didn't have caveats to remote work after the COVID shift. They went back on their word and now they continue to muck things up, stress people out, and implement changes that literally benefit nobody.
I've left feedback on the FAQ. There should be some sort of communication, update, or clarification at this point. People with Mac or VDI still don't know why data is wrong and when it will be resolved.
It will continue to be an ever-evolving mess until they return to the pre-Covid flexibility that existed in business lines where the type of work permitted remote work. This mess will continue to waste countless hours all across the business, top to bottom, and erode goodwill for absolutely no positive return.