Thread regarding Xerox Corp. layoffs

The comparison…

… between the weekend of Bandy 🤡, CB chuck, our CMO, our sales-operations-but-don’t-know-anything-head and the other EC members. Counting their money. Putting the future of the company and any thought about employees at the back of their mind. Making up a new talk-track about how everything is working, failing at every ethical measure they can, showing the world their lack of moral compass or fibre

….. and the employees who have been let-down, disrespected, kept in the dark, miscommunicated to, not sure what happens next, constant feels of dread, or knowing in that this week is the last week here, or spending precious family time looking for a new role as the Kool Aid has been drunk and people seem to think Lexmark will save us. Xerox will go bankrupt because of Lex acquisition - Xerox has been around for 100+ years but add Lexmark and the down projection accelerates.


by
| 1581 views | | 26 replies (last February 23) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+1kj3ec5mt

26 replies (most recent on top)

@aj They (business leaders) yap and yap about hardware being important. All the sales numbers they quote are hardware related. New Lexmark into the portfolio is all they are yapping about. New color presses are a big talking point. Yer right, that being a "copier" business is nothing to reinvent. Stop offshoring and turning people that answer phones into bots. It's all going to sh1t

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @ev+1kj3ec5mt

@dc "Xerox has a heritage" and that heritage has many mistakes in it of not capitalizing on inventions. Xerox PARC (Palo Alto Research Center), founded in 1970, revolutionized computing by inventing foundational technologies like the Graphical User Interface (GUI) with mouse, Ethernet networking, laser printing, and the Alto personal computer.

And where is Xerox in any of these inventions.. just printing.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @dz+1kj3ec5mt

@b7 Stupid is as stupid does, that's what momma always said.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @dx+1kj3ec5mt

@ae just a sale of country Hicksville. No idea outside the corn fields.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @dd+1kj3ec5mt

@b8 yes, you should be. Instead you spend your whole time and energy dissing Xerox (even though beyond print you have no idea - couldn’t sell a digital services offering or ITS), not recognize that Xerox has a heritage that should be respected (accepting Xerox is sliding down hill) and making no attempt to integrate. If it’s not LEX your brains can’t handle it

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @dc+1kj3ec5mt

Wow, pretty sad you all have to keep posting so much to try and validate yourselves. Must be tough sticking around that toxic cesspool when they keep crapping all over you.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @br+1kj3ec5mt

@bf The fact that the focus is now on integrating Xerox and Lexmark, it is an admission that the reinvention plan that was supposed to bring Xerox to a tech powerhouse has finally ended miserable, drawing Xerox closer to Ch. 11. Yes, they need to carve something out for the wider investor audience. I don't think any of them buy that by the fact that the share price plunge further, pushing Xerox closer to a miserable end.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @bk+1kj3ec5mt

@b7 stalling the inevitable. Desperation.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @bf+1kj3ec5mt

@ba Before we know it the wall will fall down from all the ideas they are throwing at it

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @bb+1kj3ec5mt

@b7, they saw another fledgling company and decided to make a deal. They thought that buying lexmark, itsavvy, all these other places, it was strengthening their portfolio to a) get more investors, and then b) eventually sell it off as a whole or in pieces and flip a profit for themselves and investors.

neither of these scenarios are working, so they are just throwing things at the wall at this point.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @ba+1kj3ec5mt

@aw Were so blessed that the excellent leadership team at Xerox decided to rescue us then.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @b8+1kj3ec5mt

@av if Lexmark was such a loser why did Xerox buy them and try and to buy them before this purchase? What was the reason Xerox purchasing Lexmark?

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @b7+1kj3ec5mt

@aj If copiers were in such high demand then why reinvent at all, why would Icahn come in in 2022/2023, why is the boat sinking. The reality is that Xerox made the decision to buy Lexmark, they took out the loans and bonds to do it. Lexmark is not to blame for this they are the one being purchased.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @b6+1kj3ec5mt

@a2 Lexmark wasn't able to survive at all. Everything was clear - knowing numbers (and management choices, attitudes, decisions) you can be sure it was 'written'.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @aw+1kj3ec5mt

@ae that is a fake reason! Lexmark was loosing money for years. While it was not public during chinese period I know all numbers and backgrounds and I preferred to leave with money instead of loosing everything (money and health). Something very simple happened: 2 companies weren't able to survive and dis whatever possible to delay their end. Chinese were quite foxy to recover something. Lexmark and Xerox earned some months. Investors are the losers as they pushed additional money with no chance to recover

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @av+1kj3ec5mt

Xerox is filled with managers who contribute zero value to projects and worker bees who are over worked. This placed is being run into the ground.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @as+1kj3ec5mt

I just don't understand what we are reinventing. Nothing is ever explained and every memo that comes out is just buzzwords and no meaning.

Why would we reinvent our business? Copiers are what Xerox does. Copiers are in demand, best example being the fact that our company has declined so far that our customers are leaving us for other copier companies because they just want to use a copier.

Be the copier company. There's nothing wrong with that.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @aj+1kj3ec5mt

If two garbage trucks collide head on. Who is at fault?

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @ah+1kj3ec5mt

@ac we are in good hands then

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @ag+1kj3ec5mt

@ae not economic but LEX still managed to lose $600M !!!

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @af+1kj3ec5mt

@a3 I agree that Lexmark purchase was a mistake but remember that Lexmark was owned by a Chinese set of companies under major political pressure to sell the company. This wasn’t like many other sales, it was essentially a fire sale due to political reasons not economic.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @ae+1kj3ec5mt

@OP our CMO is the best in the industry, he has the best reinvention ideas, was a brilliant sales leader and one of the most inspiring and motivational selfless leaders you will ever meet 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @ac+1kj3ec5mt

The executive committee are the kind of people who sit in the conference room and look out the window hoping to see a homeless mans lottery ticket blow away.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @a4+1kj3ec5mt

@a2 the ship was sinking but Lexmark has added too much weight which means it will sink quicker. If Lex don’t like being bought by Xerox (and so are now Xerox themselves) why did they agree to it or why did so many of the employees not just leave before or leave now?

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @a3+1kj3ec5mt

Don't blame Lexmark for the ship sinking.. the ship was sinking before we came on board. It would have been better if Ichan delt with Xerox when he was around and Lexmark was bought out by anyone else.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @a2+1kj3ec5mt

Post a reply

: