We're losing jobs in one place, but they're adding plenty new jobs in other places. Wouldn't a simple hiring freeze accomplish the same cost savings without destroying morale and losing experienced people?
5 replies (most recent on top)
Sprint did this too. They also hired you back as a freelancer when they didn't have headcount to do work that still needed to be done.
VPs, Directors, managers, playing a shell game with budgets to make them look like they are saving "so much money", at our expense.
@ba I agree! It will be much better when the place is full of young people who got participation trophies and melt down when given constructive feedback!
I bet you’re talking about the MWR where frontline people were hired and now those that where already here are going to be let go. Lets be real. They were and are going to be let go because they contribute nothing, and whine and snivel about everything. They need to bring in fresh people who actually want to work and not whine.
They also want to flush out the geezers and hire new blood. Entire company can't be a geriatric ward.
You want them to treat people like PEOPLE? Nah. They are on assets. Human resources.