Thread regarding DXC Technology layoffs

Best and Worst accounts

When senior management talk, it often feels like they’re describing a completely different company.

I’m trying to work out whether I’m just in one of the worst-run accounts, and many of the frustrations raised here are actually coming from the same few places. Or whether this is a more general, across-the-board issue.

Sometimes the advice is simply “leave”, so I wonder if that comes from people in well-run accounts who genuinely can’t see or relate to the problems others are dealing with.

Out of interest:
• Which account do you predominantly work on?
• On a scale of 1–10 (where 1 is the worst place you’ve ever worked and 10 is the best), how would you rate it?


by
| 1381 views | | 5 replies (last January 21) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+1kf825703

5 replies (most recent on top)

Another vote for BAE. Although other than log in, I've hardly done anything this year, but as I have a chargeable WBS code for a project which insists it "might" need me. That's all my manager cares about.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @qf+1kf825703

@c1 - you are bang on. Why would the customer go strategic with us when half of the employee's have lost interest in work and the executive's just here to loot and plunder.

The customers use us as handyman aka for tactical fixes and projects.

The senior executives are fully aware of this and have a strategy to maximize their take home pay.

God save dxc and the employees (executives and customers have great options)

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @ff+1kf825703

BAE – the worst place I’ve ever worked.

Everything is painfully slow and tedious. Any work we’re asked to do quickly becomes stalled behind the pretence of “security” and “process” — rules that, in practice, seem to apply only to DXC.

Huge amounts of time are wasted waiting for access, approvals, or information. When useful work does finally get unblocked, it’s rushed through as the real focus seems to be on the documentation. Obviously the clear intention is they won’t need our involvement much longer.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @es+1kf825703

Large majority of the accounts are waiting for the right moment to exit altogether. They’re using their current level of spend as leverage to push for lower prices and more concessions. There’s an unspoken but very real rule at play. They’re no longer committing to anything strategic or long-term. They’re keeping engagements short, tightly defined and easy to move to another vendor at a moment’s notice. What’s striking is that many of these customers seem more forward-thinking than our own management. They clearly understand the risk of over-dependence on us as a financially unstable partner and have been actively taking steps to reduce that dependency, even while continuing to do business with us on a tactical basis. There are a few new customers that management has been celebrating with a lot of fanfare, like Carnival, but the reality is different. These customers are value shoppers. They’re coming to us because they’re getting better pricing than they would from Indian pure-play vendors, often at the direct expense of our own profitability, leveraging the desperation of our management to show new clients in the mix. While the wins may look good on the surface, they are largely price-driven at the expense of our profitability selling vanilla services that any one can immediately take over. These are not a vote of confidence in our long-term value or differentiation.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @c1+1kf825703

Simply leave (if you are qualified!)

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @bf+1kf825703

Post a reply

: