Thread regarding Wells Fargo & Co. layoffs

Compliance and Ops Risk Combining??

Did anyone catch the question during the AMA event where SM admitted they were seriously considering combining Ops Risk and Compliance? She said she thought it was a good idea and that our peer banks have already done it... Is Compliance done for??


by
| 1521 views | | 5 replies (last November 23) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+1kamc5t54

5 replies (most recent on top)

the simple truth is you don't need as many people to keep you out of trouble as you needed to get you out of trouble.

WF has a way overstaffed first, second and third line of defense relative to peers. No way that's going to be status quo when the overall expense ratio is still so bloated.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @hv+1kamc5t54

@hs can we stop blaming all layoffs on ai? Let’s all just be honest here.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @ht+1kamc5t54

What SM didn’t say is that DF thinks compliance is too bloated of a function and that compliance (and market risk) headcount will be reduced significantly due to agentic AI

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @hs+1kamc5t54

That should be easy for a firm that doesn't follow rules and treats compliance as optional.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @cm+1kamc5t54

Compliance is fine. If I was ORBO, I would be nervous.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @a3+1kamc5t54

Post a reply

: