Thread regarding Verizon Wireless layoffs

The next layoff after next - Already planned

The next wave isn’t some mystery, it’s already baked into our strategy. When leadership pivots this hard into AI, it isn’t because they suddenly care about “efficiency.” It’s because they’re building a structure where human labor becomes optional.

Once the next round is done and AI systems hit their next iteration milestone, the company will need another injection of savings to justify the spend. That’s when the follow-up layoff is planned. Everyone will be surprised. It won't be because the market shifted overnight. Because massive automation projects always demand a second cut to “realize value" it's the only way we make the money from it.

And the pattern is predictable:
• automate what you can,
• offshore what you can’t,
• shrink the org until the balance sheet looks cleaner.

People keep saying, “AI can’t replace us.” But that’s exactly what these systems are being trained to do, absorb workflows, mimic decisions, and reduce headcount. It won’t replace everyone, but it will replace enough roles to hit whatever targets leadership promised the board.

We’re watching a slow-motion restructuring disguised as innovation. Employees feel it long before leadership admits it. Pretending otherwise doesn’t protect anyone, it just blindsides people who could’ve been preparing.

Leadership has already set this in motion and they know the next outcome but they're going to work you harder than ever so the AI gets trained on good data practices as you all help to make the AI perfect.

At least we don't see any government regulators coming down to regulate AI and save jobs....oh yeah, probably because the top AI company's own the AI conversation right now and they need to move fast before they lose control.

Good luck to all


by
| 3371 views | | 5 replies (last November 18) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+1ka2ee50d

5 replies (most recent on top)

I was on a dark project and the AI planning was set with a time table of 5-7 years leaning more towards 5. This was 3 years ago.... while looking at the exponential growth of LLM the time table for sure aligns. I just know verizons horrible implementation is what will drag it out.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @tk+1ka2ee50d

@a8 I will bet my 401k against Dans and any other dummy here that AGI does not exist in 2 years.

Or alternatively, if you believe in Dan and the AGI fantasy, we can discuss the sale of some Magic Beans that I bet would interest you.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @pf+1ka2ee50d

@a7 it absolutely can be a replacement. We're using it right now as a multiplier to get our stuff done but that's not the end goal. The goal is to be a force multiplier for the employer get more done with less people. Eventually you start having an AI manager that only needs to make sure the AI is working and add that human feedback loop for those small errors

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @n8+1ka2ee50d

Dan is sold on AGI taking hold in 2 years. At that point, all jobs get replaced, including most, if not all, C-suites.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @a8+1ka2ee50d

A lot of people here don’t have much experience with AI… it’s not a replacement, but makes for a great force multiplier for an employee that knows what he’s doing. On its own, not that useful.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @a7+1ka2ee50d

Post a reply

: