Thread regarding Wells Fargo & Co. layoffs

Bipartisan Bill Would Require Employers to Report AI-Related Layoffs

A bipartisan bill introduced on November 5, 2025, would require large companies and federal agencies to report AI-related layoffs to the Department of Labor.

Senators Josh Hawley (R-Mo.) and Mark Warner (D-Va.) proposed the AI-Related Job Impacts Clarity Act. The DOL would collect this data and publish public reports for Congress.

Hawley says people need to understand how AI affects jobs, noting predictions that AI could increase unemployment by 20% in five years.

This follows other legislative efforts:

  • Bernie Sanders warned AI could replace 97 million jobs in the next decade. He proposed solutions like a "robot tax," ending tax breaks for automation, and a 32-hour workweek.

  • Nancy Mace introduced a bill for AI training in federal workplaces.

  • Mark Kelly proposed an "AI Horizon Fund" where top AI companies would contribute to worker retraining and support.

Several states already regulate workplace AI use. New York, California, and Colorado require things like bias audits or disclosure of AI in hiring.

The main concern is that companies lack resources to train employees on AI, while pressure grows to adopt the technology.

https://www.cnbc.com/2025/11/05/ai-jobs-act-warner-hawley.html


by
| 941 views | | 10 replies (last November 11) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+1k9qtvjgy

10 replies (most recent on top)

Charlie has job security regarding AI. After 18 months of round the clock Silicon Valley work, they have failed to create an AI bot d-mb enough to replace him.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @dh+1k9qtvjgy

Typical legislation that's meaningless.

What does an "AI layoff" even mean? How do you figure out if you didn't hire someone because of AI? What counts as AI?

How many jobs have been lost do to the spreadsheet? How many jobs have been created do the the spreadsheet?

Real changes in technology affecting jobs are rarely so simple.

LLM job loss is just a circlej--kat this point between people who haven't used the things for actual work, and the AI companies who salivate at how much large companies are going to pay them to replace the workers who think they're all gonna get the axe.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @ab+1k9qtvjgy

They should sponsor a bill disclosing offshoring especially to India related layoffs.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @aa+1k9qtvjgy

The way these AI clowns gleefully post about the pyramid scheme that-best case scenario-puts everyone out of work, you'd think this board was meant for layoff enthusiasts and not victims

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @a9+1k9qtvjgy

Sam Altman has a really good price on a bridge that OP just can't pass up

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @a7+1k9qtvjgy

It’s wild seeing regular joes parrot these con artists. The smug ignorance of AI evangelists can’t be overstated.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @a6+1k9qtvjgy

Yeah there are multiple things going on here with those bills: anything built on the assumptions provided by LLM companies’ wild predictions is pretty suspect.

Of course they want to push the narrative that they’ll be replacing so many jobs and can swoop in on a white horse to train people on this garbage.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @a5+1k9qtvjgy

"The main concern is that companies lack resources to train employees on AI, while pressure grows to adopt the technology."

Lol the article does not say that at all.

AI weirdos hallucinating their bizarre agenda into everything, many such cases!

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @a4+1k9qtvjgy

good for stats and analysis, not sure if it helps the worker.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @a1+1k9qtvjgy

Post a reply

: