Thread regarding Nike Inc. layoffs

Apparel Leadership is a Dumpster Fire of Missed Opportunities

Nike's apparel leadership is sleepwalking through a masterclass in mediocrity, churning out clothes that fit like a midlife crisis and feel like a betrayal of their own "Just Do It" mantra.

Earth to Beaverton: the market is screaming for fitted, functional, and actually wearable gear, but you're too busy peddling baggy, outdated designs that belong in a clearance bin at a discount store. Lululemon, Vuori, and Fabletics are eating your lunch because they get it consumers will pay for quality, fit, and style.

Meanwhile, Nike's stuck in a 90s time warp, dressing athletes like they're auditioning for a Kohl's sale rack.

Your 25.7 line was a half-hearted nod at progress, but it’s still a swing and a miss. Not everyone wants to drown in oversized fabric that screams "I gave up." Take a look at golf, poor Scottie Scheffler looks like he’s wearing a hand-me-down tent every weekend. Your "standard fit" polos are a joke, forcing players to tuck in yards of excess fabric just to avoid looking like they raided their dad’s closet. Golf shorts? Baggy, long, and about as flattering as a potato sack.

Running shorts are fine, congrats on getting one thing right but your golf joggers are an insult to anyone who values style or function. Sweats are not joggers, Nike. Get a grip.

Who’s modeling these designs? A team of couch potatoes who think "athleisure" means "loungewear for Netflix binges"? The market is begging for fitted cuts, premium materials, and sizing that doesn’t assume every customer is built like a linebacker.

Consumers are dropping serious cash on brands that respect their bodies and lifestyles. Lululemon’s stock is proof of that. Nike, you’re sitting on a goldmine of opportunity, but your apparel team is too busy sniffing their own fumes to notice. Step up, ditch the initio, or keep handing the apparel crown to brands that actually listen to the market.


by
| 2561 views | | 12 replies (last August 29) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+1k3rjy99h

12 replies (most recent on top)

@ef Welcome to the chat, JJ

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @fs+1k3rjy99h

@ef SERIOSULY. The OP is def not in product, fit, or even knowing what is on trend. Look at the volume drivers. America is Dad Bods.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @f1+1k3rjy99h

@ef lol that’s the point of being a designer … to be on or ahead of the trends. But that sounds about right for someone who is in design

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @f0+1k3rjy99h

This is a rewritten version of my post (OP here). I even typo’d 24.7 and called it 25.7 on accident in my post and is reused the same here. Very strange.

https://www.thelayoff.com/post/@OP+1k3hxr7q5

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @et+1k3rjy99h

There will always be missed opportunities, let’s see you get into a design or development role and understand the timelines it takes to build product AND predict the trends many years in advance.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @ef+1k3rjy99h

This is spot on. The sizes are obnoxiously horrid in fit. It’s like the designers keep their eyes closed when they go out.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @df+1k3rjy99h

This is 100% spot on. I only wear Vuori and Faherty - so soft and actually looks good. I'm in my 40's and I thought maybe I just aged out of nike clothes.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @cs+1k3rjy99h

You’re paying $60 for a t-shirt that’s gonna look like it’s been through a lawnmower after three washes. The “elite” shorts? Bro, they’re just basic gym shorts with a swoosh tax.……da post is spot on………

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @cm+1k3rjy99h

This reads like AI

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @cf+1k3rjy99h

Is this not almost the same comment as topic like 3 down titled “I know Nike is a footwear company buy…”.

Very strange plagiarism bot action going on

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @bx+1k3rjy99h

$LULU is down 45% over the last 5 years lol

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @bq+1k3rjy99h

Sit in a meeting with JJ and you will know why…

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @a3+1k3rjy99h

Post a reply

: