Both ELT and now SLT appear focused on hiring primarily through Rogers Communications’ network of associates - aka, friends.
Simply reshaping the organizational structure will not drive real change that's needed. The company is not functioning as a truly international business, but rather as one directed by individuals whose decisions risk undermining its future while their personal connections receive disproportionate advancement.
@a7
query your active directory and find out who were joined in any Canada locations in last 9 months at level of M* and peek on their profile in linkedIn.
@d8 this is valid
Meanwhile I spend a chunk of my job to read some of the horror stories where the inverse is happening and Complaince needed reached a few years ago. Some of the teams are painfully lax on that to avoid corporate bouts. The two aren't mutually exclusive but depending on correction I'm torn on how to proceed. Especially if I'm decent about it and apply it to my own teams' faults.
Time will tell how far things go - but I think this is going to be pretty deep. Either a deep higher up purge, or a deep cut of the rest of us.
Product teams are being run into the ground through layoffs and attrition. Compliance and burdening process (by mandate) grind productivity to a near halt. I don’t think the board is aware of the incompetence and micromanaging that exists in the upper management ranks. Clean sweep is needed.
I mean nearly every recent thread has a 'this is Mark' or 'this is Paul' clapback.
The tea is great but it wouldn't surprise me anymore
What is your basis for this claim? Unless you are on the executive committee, how to you know who they are considering?