Thread regarding ConocoPhillips layoffs

Updated Target Cut Percentage

Has anyone else heard the updated rumored target cuts? I have had two director-level people say that the new target is 45%. Both of them were in conversation, and their body language backed it up.

I am curious if any of you have heard that.

by
| 5411 views | | 18 replies (last July 3) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+1jy71aesq

18 replies (most recent on top)

@21p that's absolutely correct. I've observed that some long-tenured IT personnel seem to lack basic understanding of fundamental business operations and concepts, surprised most leaders can't explain the distinction between conventional and unconventionals!

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @244+1jy71aesq

Hopefully one team actually does get cut, IT. Those d-mb people deliver zero value and their workforce is more than 10%. Start with their top person.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @21p+1jy71aesq

They will lay off people and count their spouses as head count so we can meet targets

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @zv+1jy71aesq

Huge cut in Houston center

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @xj+1jy71aesq

I heard it was 200%, they are going to bring back people that were laid off years ago and re-fire them!

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @wv+1jy71aesq

@sy I've heard that many functions will be cut 125%

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @vb+1jy71aesq

I’ve heard that departments that influence the price of oil will be safe. All others will be cut 100%

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @sy+1jy71aesq

Agreed, 45% would be more of a specific area or function. Likely to be more in the 20-30% range overall.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @qz+1jy71aesq

@bb We say we want to be 'competitive', but we don't set processes to allow us to be competitive. ChickFila is competitive. . . .we are more like waiting in line at the DMV. Do you see us operating like ChickFila (in a metaphorical sense)?

We will say we want to be competitive but then still have to justify our job repeatedly or make 10 presentations why we are making a decision. You can't have both (be competitive but also super-cautious on decisions-making)!!

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @px+1jy71aesq

Aside from the fact that directors are pretty low in the pecking order so are probably just talking about rumors. If you are expecting to get anything from the people at this site that isn't just more guessing you will be disappointed.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @m7+1jy71aesq

I heard 75-80% cut

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @kv+1jy71aesq

Possibly true but that's FTEs + contractors most likely and contractors should be the heavier weight of cut which will put more accountability on employees to deliver rather than take a free paycheck!

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @k2+1jy71aesq

Management is finally arriving at a target that could put us in a competitive position. The works that adds value will continue and that work which isn’t consequential will fade from our memories.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @bn+1jy71aesq

Probably 45% for a specific area, not company wide. Like the previous poster said, the work doesn't go away. I've said this before and I'll say it again - it depends on your function.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @be+1jy71aesq

Haha if it’s 40%+, you really have to weigh if it’s worth it to stick around. I guarantee 40% of the work isn’t going away. Management will still want things to the nth degree.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @bb+1jy71aesq

@OP 45% of the staff is getting cut??

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @b4+1jy71aesq

40’s have been talked about for awhile, so it’ll be interesting to see if it comes true. Just like last time, org charts will be drawn, names will be listed, and the axe will fall within about 3 months. So look for an October surprise.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @ak+1jy71aesq

Org charts are being filled out in July

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @a7+1jy71aesq

Post a reply

: