Too cheap to pay the WSJ, but what I did read doesn’t mention WF. Not because our DEI has been rationalized (as if) but rather because we don’t matter.
This must frustrate our Napoleonic money-center poseur in Hudson Yards.
9 replies (most recent on top)
See https://archive.ph/iJH5Q for a copy of the article mentioned.
DEI is very unethical and needs to be removed as soon as possible.
@br+1jj74wtz
Boohoo man. You sound like an unstable cry baby and are likely projecting with your mental health diagnosis of others. Take a breath. You'll be fine. If sane people survived the brain dead 46, you'll make it through 47. You got through 45 somehow.
It's the year of DEI, ex: a constitutionally prohibited from running convicted neurodivergent tangerine was hired to dismantle the federal government.
For the rest of his career Shart can't work anywhere that doesn't have a DEI program. I don't care if WF is the last company in America that has one, it won't change while that id--t is the CEO.
WF has a dark cloud over this place...
LOL!
WF cant move like a regular bank like JPM, BNY and GS. I don't know if you know it but there is a dark cloud over this place, from the scandals to CEO saying he cant find minority execs to hire. This company cant afford any self generated bad press at all.
https://www.wsj.com/finance/banking/dei-banking-finance-goldman-sachs-jp-morgan-257a17c7
Link ?