Thread regarding Wells Fargo & Co. layoffs

HR Department STILL forcing fake and deceptive job interviews

This has nothing to do with the fake job interviews surrounding Charlie’s quest to increase diversity, for which the bank was heavily criticized and fined. I am referring to Wells Fargo’s standard procedure for when a manager wants to promote a qualified candidate within their own department.

Here is what is happening every day at Wells Fargo. A department has a job opening, and a manager wants to give that job to a highly qualified existing employee whom the manager views as the perfect fit for the available position. Manager is forced by HR to post the job and interview x # of candidates, knowing full well that the manager will ultimately hire their original choice. All of the hopeful job interviewers never had a real chance. It is a waste of time based on a ridiculous policy within WFC HR.

It is a policy which may have started with good intentions but, as usual, WFC managed to F it up in it’s execution.

Managers know it is yet another corporate hoop they have to jump through in order to work around unrealistic HR policies which are making life hard for everyone involved. It is a waste of time, and delays a department’s ability to move forward for months. Not to mention the false hope created for our employees who legitimately are trying to advance within the company. If the C-Suite and HR don’t know this is happening, they have their heads in the sand. They are unwilling to recognize or acknowledge this failure of a policy.

We should all question how many of the job postings at Wells Fargo are real vs how many of the job openings are pure corporate pretense.

by
| 1968 views | | 10 replies (last November 21, 2022) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+1jMvOECS

10 replies (most recent on top)

People listen - this is a process issue because we have no strong way to promote internal talent. If we promote it is either not approved or we get no backfill. This whole talk about racism is false.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @2tct+1jMvOECS

This happened with me a few months ago. I thought the same thing. The hiring manager could not move forward until recruiting talked to a certain number of candidates. As soon as those interviews commenced they could extend the offer. It was conveyed to me as a formality. I was happy about it, but it made me think about the other people interviewing. It seemed ridiculous and the process is still broken.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1xka+1jMvOECS

I hire a lot. Never had a recruiter tell me to do "fake interviews". Of course I want the biggest/best pool and the best possible candidate. Sometimes that's internal, sometimes not, but in the former case it doesn't mean that the other interviews are "fake". I don't know who's best for the job until after they are all done. I doubt this whole fake interview thing is a widespread issue. If it is, maybe I should be getting a higher rating for superior recruiting/hiring skills!

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @bnm+1jMvOECS

In Charlie's defense, all HR departments do this to one extend or another. Side note, I hate to defend Charlie.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @ojk+1jMvOECS

My former employer just promoted people when warranted. I went from supervisor to second level manager without a posting. We need this here. It’s a waste of everyone’s time for this nonsense to occur.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @kau+1jMvOECS

Is this really exclusive to WF though?
HR is aware & encourages this IMO. As a hiring manager, I’ve been routinely asked by the recruiter assigned if I had anyone in mind for the position. At first it felt odd and I thought it was just that recruiter trying to make easy work for themselves but have since found that’s routine-wrong or right- but routine. I follow my own integrity though and have encouraged others to apply while never promising anything and let the interview process play out fairly.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @rdf+1jMvOECS

I went through this recently. 1 job took over 6 + months of interviews. They kept on adding additional interviews or "tests/exercises" until they got the result they wanted. That was the last job I applied for at WF. Look elsewhere.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @uek+1jMvOECS

they did this to me a couple of times. I basically quite quit and binge watch Yellowstone and other shows on a ipad i bring to work. Nothing makes me laugh harder than watching 30 diversity hires make a mess things and watching the company double down by hiring more.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @qwr+1jMvOECS

I work in Tech and can confirm. Us slaves in the trenches are told by our all-powerful Executives that off-cycle or midyear promotions are NOT ALLOWED. So pre-filling open jobs with candidates has basically become a backdoor way for Execs to promote people. As OP said, the other candidates interviewing for the job never had a chance... black, white, female, whatever. It was always going to go to the person the Exec wanted to promote but couldn't through a traditional process. Long Live our Lord and Savior CHAINSAW!

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @alz+1jMvOECS

Yep, it happens all the time. I've been the recipient and victim of it.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @juc+1jMvOECS

Post a reply

: