If a great employee leaves and the company later needs to replace him by employing three people who neither know the job nor are they very interested in the job - then that is a bad management practice which probably costs the company a lot. When will Sam's finally realize that it is more cost-effective and beneficial to try to keep great employees? Will they ever?
6 replies (most recent on top)
They hire naïve and weak people that they can control and intimidate. They don’t want smart people that stand up for themselves.
The management at n.o.v.i are the worst. Most couldn't do anything without a.nd.rew micro managing everything. He even tells them when to wipe.
Sam's Club views a top performing, long-term associate to be an expense rather than an asset. Definitely time to unionize or move on. On second thought, just move on.
It is a down hill slope. A typical manager will hire people they believe are less capable / d-mber than themselves. As those d-mber people eventually move into management ( and they will because they are d-mb} they in turn hire d-mber people than themselves. This has went on at Sams til you get what we have today. Id--ts and or adult sized ten year olds running the place.
This is the new style of management sams club is going with. Look at my club all the managers are pos. N.o.v.i
That means the manager has 3 scapegoats. And can blame lead for not training any of them correct.