Thread regarding AT&T layoffs

Legg doesn't want anonymous questions

For Legg next town hall, people can no longer submit anonymous questions.

The reason that was given, "they want to address answers by name to the person asked" and "they want to distill a feeling that there will not be retaliation to anyone asking questions".

There will probably only be fluff questions submitted or none at all now. That was probably the intent anyway.

by
| 1600 views | | 13 replies (last April 21, 2022) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+1gl6vqkK

13 replies (most recent on top)

its all about control. If you remove the fake anonymity he exposes the comment creators
triggering control and indirect censorship from anyone above your org. ladder.
They'll come knocking at your door if they think you'll put them in a bad position with
their boss

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1haf+1gl6vqkK

Legg wants to cut down the questions that aim right at the incompetency of management in this company and does so by making them a self identified target.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1qzi+1gl6vqkK

I am in Legg’s org and he initially came in as rhe Warner star but the shine has wore off. Not one thing he has done of note now all we hear is the race to save $600MM no vision no strategy. He is another clueless nice guy who is probably looking for his exit. I can’t wait for the stupid live band to stop it was cute at first now I just gag

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1gzh+1gl6vqkK

To all the kool aid drinkers, what has Jeremy done for T lately? What has Jeremy ever done to make T successful? Crickets!

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @rgb+1gl6vqkK

Yep. A way to increase transparency and candor. Act Boldly indeed!

Oh, and also a way to make the top executives' job for deciding who to layoff that much easier.

AT&T: Only sycophants and spineless worms need apply.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @exv+1gl6vqkK

Jeremy is a coward!

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @ljn+1gl6vqkK

"Tired of gutless malcontents hiding behind anonymity."

Like you?

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @xkw+1gl6vqkK

Tired of gutless malcontents hiding behind anonymity.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @zce+1gl6vqkK

Pro tip.
You want to make a difference?
Stop talking to them.
Zero surveys.
Zero feedback.
Don't say anything.
Ever.
It really bothers them and their egos that the "peons" just won't engage.
They don't care. These are Psyops to get employees convinced management gives a Sheet.
They don't.
Shut up.
Don't ask any questions.
Divorce yourself from work emotionally.
Smile and wave.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @apd+1gl6vqkK

"Leaders"
hahahahahahahahahahahaha.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @loy+1gl6vqkK

This is the full text as to why no anonymous questions are allowed. It seems like there is no option not to associate your question with your name.

In an effort to improve our culture of candor and connection, we are adding a new personalized option to the Inquire tool. This enables participants to engage with the platform in a more intimate and transparent way. When this option is selected, participants will have the ability to associate themselves with their questions, and leaders will have the ability to address question askers by name when providing responses. The goal of this change is to align to our "Act Boldly" culture pillar and increase our practice of candor and transparency and ultimately enhance our culture of psychological safety (where people feel comfortable speaking up without fear of reprisal). This is intended to be one step in our cultural transformation journey and will be done in conjunction with other cultural changes.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @iwm+1gl6vqkK

Maybe have someone who doesn't care about retaliation submit all the questions as a proxy.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @bqt+1gl6vqkK

Yea, sure thing.
I'll not participate.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @rfs+1gl6vqkK

Post a reply

: