Thread regarding Chevron Corp. layoffs

Working hard was never enough

You have to be political enough to keep your job. You don't work in a vacuum, you work with people and should be part of a team. If you can't get along with your teammates and/or management, then you have a problem and may not be around very long.

This is true for promotions as well and many people who keep complaining about not being able to get a promotion fail to realize this. They think working hard should be enough to get them up the ladder when that was never the truth. Playing the game and making sure you're on good terms with as many people as possible is key to progressing. No matter how hard you work, if you don't kiss the right behind occasionally, you can kiss that promotion goodbye.

by
| 1807 views | | 9 replies (last December 23, 2021) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+1eo1mExJ

9 replies (most recent on top)

Modern Chevron management covets being like Amazon, Google, or Apple. All of which, by the way, hate anything to do with the oil industry.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @3oxn+1eo1mExJ

In any large organization, you have to be able to influence people to get results. Politics is the art of influencing people. If you dont want to deal with politics then you shouldnt have joined a massive corporation.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @2hbd+1eo1mExJ

These arguments have been going on for the 40+ years I have worked and probably 40+ before that. Management will let you know if you are a HiPot or eligible for promotion. Telling them you deserve something or asking how to get there is a waste of time. You will be given all sorts of make work stuff then the person who you are counting on to advance you gets a different job leaving you in the dust. I'm glad I took the EOI and got out of the circus.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1vtg+1eo1mExJ

@yia. I’ve been around long enough to remember that emphasis on these non-performance metrics were what started Texaco down the road of irrelevancy.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1jkx+1eo1mExJ

"Politics" is vastly more than "getting along". It is thinking hard about who has power and influence over what and every strategy and tactic you can use to gain leverage. It is about alliances with those you share commonalities and against those you wish to defeat. It is knowing very well who your enemies are and keeping them close. You can do extremely well in Chevron if you know how to play politics because most employees do not and you can simply roll over them without them ever figuring out what happened much less how you did it.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @rku+1eo1mExJ

@qgg. Yes. Precisely why Chevron hasn’t been able to hire anything but mediocre petrotechs for the last 10 years. Well reflected in abysmal exploration record and bloated lifting costs.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @bym+1eo1mExJ

Precisely why Chevron has fallen from an elite O&G company with top-notch technical staff (circa 2006) to an HR-driven, trend-following social experiment. It explains why MW so much covets being like Microsoft.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @qgg+1eo1mExJ

its all an optics game

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @cbp+1eo1mExJ

Just look at our performance review system. 3/4 of the PMP metrics are some version of “play nice with others.” Deliver Results is only 1/4 and last on the list. Apply your effort accordingly to be successful.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @yia+1eo1mExJ

Post a reply

: