The question “Will they really essentially fire more than 10% of their workforce?”. The answer, if it is in T best interest than, yes. So the real question is, do the numbers work in T favor? If so, expect them to follow through with termination threats...
__________________________________________________
My thoughts exactly. Pulled from +1eB1ewEN. What do you think, will the numbers work in T favor?
11 replies (most recent on top)
More like 1% of the nut jobs.
Stop trying to pass off deranged lies with as evidence. It ain't gonna help you.
Since the beginning, I’ve been producing the evidence COVID is a scam. Now, official agencies are virtually admitting it.
On December 29, the head of the CDC, Rochelle Walensky, announced, in a White House press briefing, that the PCR test can register positive (meaning the person is “infected”) long AFTER infection is over.
Here’s Walensky’s money quote:
“…people can remain PCR positive for up to 12 weeks after infection and long after they are transmissible and infectious.”
That means MILLIONS of FALSE positive test results have been logged as REAL, in the past two years.
If you can’t trace the implications of THAT, I can’t help you.
Recall the old Zen Koan: What is the sound of one hand clapping?
The new version is: What is the sound of the White House press corps after Walensky’s admission?
And is the answer is: Nothing. Zero. Silence. And not stunned silence. No. Clueless silence. Sold-out silence.
No shouting. No furor. No questions.
“Dear Mr. Smith, We here at the CDC wish to inform to you that your positive PCR COVID test, administered in the spring of 2020, was misleading. There was no proof it meant you were infected. Therefore, your isolation, your hospitalization, during which your business closed and went into bankruptcy, your wife left home taking up residence with the children at her mother’s, your business partner committed su----e—all that was unnecessary. Thank you for your understanding.”
Of course, the blind following the blind following Fauci will say, “But…but…the CDC couldn’t have made a mistake that big…there must be some explanation…”
And yes, there is an explanation. The CDC and other public health officials have known all along they were running a scam. Committing a crime. A Nuremberg-type crime.
@afb+1eCdmMpV I'm not in any of those layers, nor the next couple, either. I am a senior, but I am definitely not in management. I always laugh when people (usually deadwood) assume that I am, in posts here. But no, that's not me at all. There are certainly some key exceptions to your remark, but there is a lot of deadwood in leadership as well.
My peers? Across a few teams, we are the ones who don't get cut. We're core. We're key. Me, I'm the kind of guy you call when you're stuck. I'm a thinker, but also a doer. I fix things when they break on their own. I fix things when other people break them and lie to our face about breaking them, denying any knowledge... so we have to figure it out on our own. So yeah, I'm not opposed to pruning. Fewer clueless, fewer problems.
I think you people worry too much about losing your employment with T. Consider it a blessing in disguise at this time since there are loads of jobs to be had out there! I've been on pins and needles for my entire tenure with T and it's not worth it! If opportunity knocks on your door, go for it and never look back!
That day is coming and you will find out soon enough. Keep on whining cuz you are worried. You won't be missed.
Great question, only time will tell. Companies are having staffing issues right now so that could factor in. On the other hand, if T was already planning to get rid of 10% this is the best way for them to do it since there is no severance or unemployment to pay.
Seriously @avu+1eCdmMpV ? I suspect you're part of the problem that needs pruned. We could probably put the top 3 layers of AT&T management on a Boeing 747 and fly it into the side of a mountain and this company would be much better for it. In fact those that do the actual work around here wouldn't even notice they're gone.
Where have you been for the last 7 years? Of course the Megalomaniac Stink will get rid of 10%, or 20% or 99% of US based employees. No one is safe except the Stink himself.
Stink does not care about Toxic T's employees, shareholders or customers.
Stink only cares about the Stink!
And employees who don’t follow science aren’t desired for a technical company anyway.
My guess is YEP! Like proper pruning of a plant, it may even result in a healthier state, overall.