https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/world/amy-coney-barrett-strikes-surprising-ki---r-blow-against-vaccine-mandate-defiance/ar-AANhbY3?li=BBorjTa
4 replies (most recent on top)
Also, kids exposed to chicken pox also do not need varicella. Yet the US is hung up on natural immunity not being “science”.
What does this even mean? Chicken pox IS varicella. People who got chicken pox as children absolutely can and do get shingles and should receive the shingles vaccine around age 60. This virus lays dormant in your nerve cells for life and can be triggered anytime your immune system is compromised. It is unknown yet if children who received the chicken pox vaccine will need boosters after age 60.
amy barrett will dismiss any case at any opportunity she gets, she only wants the title but does not want to do the work and is scared to actually make a ruling that would have any controversy. This decision of hers to dismiss is not at all representative of the rest of the court with the possible exception of cavanaugh being the same and not wanting to actually have to put their name to a ruling. This is just barrett's way of not making any decision.. Reminds me a lot of other issues, people wanting the title and the pay but not wanting to do the work or any responsibility that comes with the job..
Schools have required vaccines for decades. But at least schools don’t have a painful and revealing exemption policy. It’s pretty easy to mark exemption on the form, it seems.
Also, kids exposed to chicken pox also do not need varicella. Yet the US is hung up on natural immunity not being “science”.
There is actually a precedence for her stance. Back in 1905 there was a mandate for smallpox vaccines and people tried to fight that one ............and lost.
https://www.history.com/news/smallpox-vaccine-supreme-court