Thread regarding AT&T layoffs

Big layoffs coming in September

Reorgs and layoffs coming in September

by
| 3944 views | | 19 replies (last May 3, 2021) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+1aACekD2

19 replies (most recent on top)

look the benefits site - bronze pre medicare 465 subsidy cost is 465 after 1/12022 it goes to 1850 - 3x - 16k per year

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @5clu+1aACekD2

2cwx+1aACekD2
Maybe proof read before you post thing on the inter web?

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @2llu+1aACekD2

"We have been given by HR list of all those folks and we are to begin talking with them and see if they are considering leaving. If so, we have complete authorization to start hiring for replacements. "

Part of the concern is that they don't want to be surprised come Oct/Nov/Dec that lots of fols will walkout. At the sametime such conversations may reveal that "benefits reduction" strategy of HR will not work for a simple reasons that math does not support it: (i) Not many have the pre-medicare subsidy (ii) pre-medicare subsidy is'nt that great (anecdotal - a family may pay $600/month in medical with subsidy, and $1000/month without subsidy. A saving of $400/month or $4800/yr. With 10more years to work that is $48K. Another 6months of job easily pays for that. If they will seek anothe rjob then the whole thing is even less persuasive.)

HR is not offering leadership good options (like VZ did), instead blocking. HR is playing excel sheet. Employees are doing that too plus some scenario analysis. Many changes HR has introduced has cost employees more productivity loss, and not much support. HR wants to prove that they can add $$ value to bottomline. That is not their role.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @2cwx+1aACekD2

"We have been given by HR list of all those folks and we are to begin talking with them and see if they are considering leaving. If so, we have complete authorization to start hiring for replacements. "

Just more proof that the company is using this new policy to reduce cost structure by removing older employees and replace them at a fraction of the cost. As a result, I have no vested interest in seeing this company succeed anymore. I want to watch it crash and burn.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @2qtt+1aACekD2

yawn - what else is new

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @2eki+1aACekD2

Where are you hearing DEG to be eliminated?

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1umc+1aACekD2

In my division we are already being told to get ready for replacing folks that are in target audience for losing pre-medicare medical subsidy. This is Jeremy Legg division.

We have been given by HR list of all those folks and we are to begin talking with them and see if they are considering leaving. If so, we have complete authorization to start hiring for replacements. That pretty much tells you no layoffs in Jeremy Legg organization. We have never had so much freedom to back fill, progress and promote in last 10 years. So talk of layoffs is a little silly in this environment at least in my division. I am a level 2 supervisor.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1vfd+1aACekD2

I retired last September. ATT is calling me to see if I want to come back as Service Tech.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1xqu+1aACekD2

No way, never happen! Business generates a large revenue stream on its own and doesn’t need consumer. Business could easily be spun off into an independent business and be very successful on its own! It makes no sense to combine both business units!

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1mle+1aACekD2

business and consumer combining?

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1pur+1aACekD2

bring it on!

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1hyb+1aACekD2

The wolf will dwell with the lamb and the represented will be betrayed as it is written. Deg to be eliminated.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1dwq+1aACekD2

Haven't heard one thing about this. Are you your own source?

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1wwu+1aACekD2

I believe the reorg part, as many older folks who are leaving due to benefit changes will need to be replaced.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @erl+1aACekD2

Hey Ralph! Please provide some insight into your projection. Given that you reduced your anonymity a great deal by providing your first name you must be a real genius. Why don't you provide the first letter of your last name - that would be very useful in a webphone search.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @vqh+1aACekD2

Based on?? I tend to doubt there will be any big layoffs before the end of the year. Upper-management is most likely banking on many "retirement eligible" employees to leave before yearend to retain benefits until that cut hits the retirees too. However, I'd bet there will be a layoff next year - around February - if/when those numbers haven't been met.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @zma+1aACekD2

Not in the occupational ranks! T wants more union members than necessary to keep Uncle Joe happy!

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @jwv+1aACekD2

Get rid of those unneeded workers.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @tkp+1aACekD2

This is the same id--t that told us big layoffs were coming in three weeks. That was five weeks ago.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @hoq+1aACekD2

Post a reply

: