Thread regarding AT&T layoffs

AT&T pushes ahead with auction of DirecTV despite 10 Billion lmomowball bids

https://www.google.com/amp/s/nypost.com/2020/10/06/att-pushes-ahead-with-auction-of-directv-despite-lowball-bids/amp/

by
| 1709 views | | 13 replies (last October 9, 2020) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+17itcDDI

13 replies (most recent on top)

Perfect karma is a b–ch cant think of a better way for directv to get revenge wish it cost att more

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @3kjg+17itcDDI

What AT&T did by acquiring DTV is criminal - investigate and punish. Stankey and Randall should end up in jail.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1dhh+17itcDDI

Do I detect an issue here?

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1dpk+17itcDDI

You won't hear about it on CNN.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1spr+17itcDDI

buy high and sell low - att's philosophy hey but rand is taken care of with 200000 a month and that is the most important item.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1gxh+17itcDDI

I realize it's the New York Post - but this story does have a ring of desperate truth nonetheless.

If the auction doesn't work out - there at least will still be Craigslist or Nextdoor Marketplace.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1otb+17itcDDI

at@t does not do one thing right. It has survived so long becuse for the first part of it's existance they had a monopoly. Then, when the iPhone came out, they had the exclusive (the one good deal they have ever made). And evry bad deal is remedied by layinf off workers.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @jzr+17itcDDI

Bunch of execs sitting around the conference room table saying, "Hey, its a subscription service, we know how to manage a subscription service!"

Yeah, right

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @kzb+17itcDDI

“People want to spin this as cord-cutting, but AT&T just decided it didn’t like the business anymore.”

This is the kind of thing that gets you sued by investors, I'd think.

Also, too, remember when Stanky said he thought subscriber loss had leveled off?

Malfeasance and incompetence all around.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @dfw+17itcDDI

$67B......$16B

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @kkq+17itcDDI

Whaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaat? OMG!!!!

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @dgt+17itcDDI

This is ridiculous! We paid 49b plus assumed 18b in debt and DTV is fetching maybe 16b 5 years later. The f@#ing id–ts who signed off on this deal, one of them is running the company now and the other is sitting on his a– collecting 273k a month due to your hard work. Where is the outrage. We as employees should be protesting for the removal of these piece of sits along with all them board of directors. We need to stand up!

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @kns+17itcDDI

a deal that also including the assumption of $18 billion in debt? ARE YOU CRAZY?..LOL

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @bfo+17itcDDI

Post a reply

: