Thread regarding AT&T layoffs

Senators Question AT&T about layoffs

Washington, D.C. – Today, U.S. Sen. Sherrod Brown (D-OH) led his colleagues in demanding answers from AT&T, after the company recently announced plans to eliminate more than 3,400 union-represented technician and clerical jobs and 1,300 retail jobs at 250 AT&T Mobility and Cricket Wireless stores that are slated to close. While the economic downturn caused by the COVID-19 pandemic has hit some sectors particularly hard, AT&T reported first quarter growth in its mobility division and fiber broadband services. In order to better understand the company’s recent announcement and its impact on workers, the senators are pressing AT&T on the reason for the layoffs and to learn what additional cost-cutting measures AT&T plans to implement in the near future.

“We understand that for many businesses, the only response to the economic downturn resulting from the COVID-19 public health emergency has been to shutter their doors and lay off workers. We object, however, to corporations using the pandemic as justification for continuing to make anti-worker decisions that are aimed at boosting share price,” the senators wrote in a letter to AT&T CEO John Stankey.

Since December 2017, AT&T has laid off more than 40,000 of its employees. Those layoffs have occurred despite AT&T promises to hire 7,000 new employees and the $21 billion immediate tax windfall the company received as a result of the Republican-passed, corporate tax giveaway, the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act. As a result of these decisions, the percentage of AT&T employees represented by a union has decreased. This year, AT&T has approximately 246,000 employees, and only 98,400 are union members. That represents a decrease of 15 percentage points of unionized workers and calls into question the underlying objective of AT&T’s layoff announcement.

The senators are asking AT&T to provide a state-by-state breakdown of the current job cuts and projected job cuts for the remainder of 2020, and to indicate whether a union represents the affected workers in each state. They’re also asking the company to indicate whether any of the services previously performed by the workers whose jobs have been eliminated will now be performed by independent contractors, subcontracted out to a different company, or sent overseas.

In addition to Brown, the letter was signed by Sens. Bernie Sanders (D-VT), Richard Blumenthal (D-CT), Tammy Baldwin (D-WI), Ed Markey (D-MA), Elizabeth Warren (D-MA), Jeff Merkley (D-OR) and Cory Booker (D-NJ).

A copy of the letter can be read here and below.

Dear Mr. Stankey:

We write in response to AT&T’s recent announcement that it would lay off thousands of workers. We are concerned that these layoffs are less related to the public health emergency, and corresponding economic downturn, and more the result of a long-term plan to cut costs to please shareholders at the expense of your employees and the communities you serve.

Earlier this month, your company disclosed that it plans to eliminate more than 3,400 union-represented technician and clerical jobs and 1,300 retail jobs at 250 AT&T Mobility and Cricket Wireless stores that are slated to close. We understand that the COVID-19 pandemic has changed customer behavior and triggered an economic downturn that has hit some sectors particularly hard, including the entertainment parts of AT&T’s business. The company, however, reported first quarter growth in its mobility division and fiber broadband services.[1] We also note that the company announced on March 3, 2020 that it would be undergoing a “headcount rationalization” as part of a cost-cutting initiative that is expected to “generate double digits of billions” of savings.[2] We are concerned that this most recent job elimination announcement is a continuation of AT&T’s years-long layoff strategy to boost share price.

Since December 2017, AT&T has laid off more than 40,000 of its employees. Those layoffs have occurred despite AT&T promises to hire 7,000 new employees and the $21 billion[3] immediate tax windfall the company received as a result of the Republican-passed, corporate tax giveaway, the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act. As a result of these decisions, the percentage of AT&T employees represented by a union has decreased. In 2014, AT&T had 243,000 employees, 133,650 of whom were represented by a union. This year, AT&T has approximately 246,000 employees, and only 98,400 are union members.[4] That represents a decrease of 15 percentage points of unionized workers and calls into question the underlying objective of AT&T’s layoff announcement.

We ask you to provide answers to the following questions to help us better understand the company’s recent announcement, its impact on the workers, and whether more job cuts are in AT&T’s future.

1) Please provide a state-by-state breakdown of the current job cuts and projected job cuts for the remainder of 2020. Please indicate whether the affected workers in each state are represented by a union. If so, please identify the union. In addition, please indicate in which division of AT&T they were employed.

2) How many technician jobs has AT&T eliminated since December 2017? How many clerical jobs? How many call center jobs? How many retail jobs?

3) Please provide information regarding the average wages and benefits earned by the recently laid off workers and their average tenure.

4) Please indicate whether any of the services previously performed by the workers whose jobs have been eliminated will now be performed by independent contractors, subcontracted out to a different company, or sent overseas.

5) How many contractor employees perform work on behalf of AT&T? How many of those contractors are technicians, call center workers, retail workers, and other workers? How many contractor employees performed work on behalf of AT&T in December 2017?

6) What are the average wages and benefits earned by employees of contractors or subcontractors who perform the duties of technicians and clerical workers?

7) In the March 3, 2020 call with investment analysts, you indicated that AT&T would undergo a “headcount rationalization.” How many layoffs are expected to be part of that “headcount rationalization” effort in the next five years? Will the majority of those layoffs affect non-management positions?

8) Do you expect to hire back any of the laid off technicians or clerical workers after the COVID-19 pandemic is over?

9) Please provide a state-by-state breakdown of the retail wireless stores that will be closed.

10) What is the unionization rate at AT&T authorized retailer stores compared to AT&T-owned stores?

by
| 1922 views | | 14 replies (last September 19, 2020) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+16ZKO7wa

14 replies (most recent on top)

This is just an act from these politicians. A headline or two to please the working class and then back to living off our taxes and lobbying fees. Grow up and deal with the truth that they are useless.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @2bmr+16ZKO7wa

This letter is from July and was posted here when it actually happened. But thanks for sharing old news?

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @2dxa+16ZKO7wa

Horrific leadership or lack there of with StanKey. He has never cared for the people. It has always been about him reaching the top! I hope congress whips him to respond and stops these layoffs that are happening just to please the Board of Directors!!
It is time the top management who carve out the icing with huge bonuses are investigated. They made the id–tic and incorrect decision s - from TMobil to DTV to TW! And these layoffs are expected to bridge that loss! Fire them all for being incompetent!!

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1nic+16ZKO7wa

Maybe if the Governors hadn't shut down businesses for months, all of these stores wouldn't be closing. It's been 6 months to flatten the curve that was supposed to be 2 weeks for a virus with an infection fatality rate of of less than 1%.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1auy+16ZKO7wa

They got tax breaks & federal funding aka taxpayer dollars....they should give out the info.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1jeh+16ZKO7wa

I’m with T on this one. Congress should not be involved in business decisions of any company.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @kdj+16ZKO7wa

No new lay-off announcements since July, you think management is gun shy given negative attention and wants to cap layoffs for this year ?

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @nrn+16ZKO7wa

"it's doubtful T will respond to their inquiry."

Oh, they'll respond, only not in the manner you expect. A meaningless hearing and some backroom deals are in store.

Also, note how there is no mention of thousands of white-collar layoffs in the letter. Dem's pandering to their base.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @ljh+16ZKO7wa

I truly hope the union people get laid off, and no one cares. no one cares what AT&T does, no one cares what some loser democrat senator getting paid union money under the table says. No one cares.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @yjj+16ZKO7wa

Isn’t this the letter that was sent a couple of months ago, in June or July?

Haven’t seen a reply by ATT reported in the press.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @wir+16ZKO7wa

It is not worth the paper it is printed on. Stank has got teflon skin and nothing will stick.

If they really want to doing something, increase tax on executive compensation, golden parachute, and close loop holes.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @frz+16ZKO7wa

It would be nice to see all the projected layoffs and locations over the next few years but; it’s doubtful T will respond to their inquiry.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @hko+16ZKO7wa

It would be nice to see all the projected layoffs and locations over the next few years but; it’s doubtful T will respond to their inquiry.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @wyv+16ZKO7wa

AT&T doesn't have to respond to this inquiry. Pretty easy tho. Finalization of 10 year plan put in place years ago. Lots of pomp from congress, to get points with voters.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @uoj+16ZKO7wa

Post a reply

: