Thread regarding AT&T layoffs

Only Stankey know how

Finally A Game Plan to—Finally—Connect Every American to Broadband

"We’ve struggled for years to bring high-speed Internet to rural and low-income Americans. Here’s how to get the job done " said John Stankey

https://www.politico.com/news/agenda/2020/09/08/a-game-plan-to-finally-connect-every-american-409171

by
| 1435 views | | 8 replies (last September 16, 2020) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+16XwzZig

8 replies (most recent on top)

I don't know why T doesn't go in big into the video game market . Provide a new console , video game streaming feeds, buy up all the Indie game manufacturer's and start pushing Sony and Microsoft for market share. That's where the future growth of money is .

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1yvu+16XwzZig

Good story about your cousin being on the BoD...nice ending, got what he deserved!

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1bhl+16XwzZig

OMG. He should have exercised his right to remain silent. Doesn't know where the coverage gaps are? Ever asked your own people? Hint: They've been submitting funding requests for decades to cover network gaps. So have municipalities.
Aaand, the company has taken billions in federal subsidies already to build out rural areas - I guess those were never really done? And he just admitted that?
If they had used those funds for the intended purpose during the last 10 years, the network would have been done by now. And now he wants more subsidies to pay again for build-outs they never did, but reported that they were? See other posts on this forum..
Recognize that he is not asking for the noble purpose of helping the disadvantaged - but because he wants somebody else to pay it, then claim subscriber growth. No network, no sub. They've frittered away all previous subsidies already, have nothing to show for, and COVID finally proved it.
I seriously want to know where all the millions went; they sure were not spent on neither network nor employees. I too am a taxpayer. I paid my taxes for stuff like this to get done.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @ber+16XwzZig

I worked for a SEVP whose edict was all travel must be approved by him AND we had to take a company car AND unless the travel was over 50 miles, we couldn't buy lunch on the purchasing card.
Problem was that stupid j–koff didn't realize that we shared 1 company car amongst 150 of us managers and probably another 200 occupationals. He also stated that we had to come to work first then take that company car to the field. His excuse was that if we took our personal car and had a wreck then we were not covered by insurance. O.K.
One morning as I was coming to work I received a call from the field that they had an emergency situation and they needed my expertise. Told them nope, have to go to my reporting location first, get a company car and then drive the 40 miles and btw I will have to leave and go home for lunch as that JkAzz edicted no lunch on the company dime. I guess the SEVP thought since he was screwing the company, use worker bees were also. I get to work and guess what, no company car. Told the field I didn't have a company car to get there. I got a call from the SEVP telling me to take my car. I explained that he was correct in that I wasn't covered by insurance and didn't have a car. They found me a company car and I drove to the problem office, the office was a FCC reportable. As I was repairing the problem, lunch time, told the field management that I had to go for home for lunch and I told them why. My blood sugar required me to eat specific way, their upper management was contacted and they catered in my food. After I fixed their problem, I was called into SEVP office and that jerk lit into me, I said excuse me, called his boss, explained the problem. That SEVP was relocated ASAP - guess he didn't know my cousin was on the BoD's and I knew his boss.
This place is the blind leading the blind.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @eed+16XwzZig

I Alone can fix it!! ............................................................. Remember?

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @kpr+16XwzZig

and then there's this:

Stankey sees HBO Max eventually reaching as much as 70% of U.S. households, giving AT&T broader entertainment distribution than DirecTV ever had and providing it with a wealth of customer data that it can use for advertising. Stankey sees HBO Max revenue making up for shrinking sales at DirecTV, but noted that the satellite-TV business remains profitable and can continue to fund investment in other areas even in its decline.

Translation: We wanted to sell DirecTV but couldn't because it's pretty much worthless. We wanted to sell Xander because we realize we are not capable of competing with Google or Facebook, but we can't....so now we'll pretend that we can get HBO Max into 70% of the country even though we can't even get it on Firestick or Roku and most of our subscribers don't even know they have something "more" than the generic HBO they signed up for.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @rah+16XwzZig

Too little, too late.

Ratty and Stinky already wasted all the borrowing power of T, and the revenue is needed to pay off Ratty overpaid mergers instead of being available for network capital improvement. Too late Stinky to fix Ratty and your mistakes.

You worthless POS will just keep riding the wave till you cannot milk it anymore and pull the rip cord on your golden parachute. You will collect your luckrative pension and the rest of us will be f*cked!

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @ymy+16XwzZig

Stankey is a Mo$ron - he needs to first answer why he wasted $B to acquire DTV. .... he has no issue stealing $M and unjustified pay raises, but I do remember at one point he asked employees travelling for business to pay for Internet charges from their own pocket while working... shame on you Stinky

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @qiu+16XwzZig

Post a reply

: