Thread regarding Honeywell International Inc. layoffs

Honeywell PAC - Highest spend again this year - leader since 2010

From the WSJ 2020 Election & Business edition:

Chart of the Week: PAC Fund Race
Honeywell, the industrial conglomerate, appears poised to keep its crown as the biggest federal corporate political action committee by total receipts, a position it has held since the 2010 election cycle, when it displaced AT&T. Boeing, currently No. 2, has been in the top five since 2016. In recent years, contributions to Republicans have generally outweighed those to Democrats from these PACS, and nearly all their 2020 contributions so far have gone to House and Senate candidates. Honeywell said its PAC supports candidates backing policies important to its businesses and the U.S. economy. Although corporations are prohibited from contributing to campaigns and political parties, their political action committees may do so, subject to limits, and raise money from company employees, primarily executives and salaried workers.

— Theo Francis

Honeywell PAC link:
https://www.fec.gov/data/committee/C00096156/

All public information.

by
| 3488 views | | 13 replies (last November 29, 2019) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+12dmaCm6

13 replies (most recent on top)

Just tell them to take out of the free 15% OT.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @3tlj+12dmaCm6

Sounds like some of leadership is getting careless or is not correctly trained in how to solicit. Quote from one of many sites regarding this. Can some of these people really say, out loud, that there is a right to refuse without reprisal, etc.

"Employers that solicit contributions from employees for its corporate PAC must ensure the employee feels their contributions are being made voluntarily. Under federal law, contributions may not be secured by the use or threat of physical force, job discrimination or financial reprisal. Employees who believe an employer has violated the law can file a complaint with the Federal Election Commission (FEC), which enforces federal election law and can levy civil penalties.

Certain notices are required on all solicitations, oral or written, and are undertaken by the SSF. Each time the SSF or the connected business solicits individuals for contributions, those individuals must be informed of the SSF’s political purpose. It’s not sufficient for the notice to merely say that a contribution to the SSF is voluntary; the notice must inform the employee of their right to refuse to contribute without reprisal from their employer.

If an SSF or connected organization suggests potential contributors give a specified amount, the solicitation must also say this is only a suggested amount, it is not enforceable, and it will not disadvantage the employee if they refuse to give."

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @2ost+12dmaCm6

They ask for 2%. And yes, a VP tracks you down if you don't give that "recommended amount".

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @2jbn+12dmaCm6

They push you to sign up to give them 20% of your income! it is a very hard sell. They DO keep track of who gives. They recommend you wear your little pin so others who give will know you are one of them.

It's disgusting actually.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @2ylg+12dmaCm6

I told them to call my wife about filling their tin cup with my hard-earned money. She runs the budget in our home. They never asked for her number.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1jbq+12dmaCm6

I heard about an employee who got a PAC call from an ALT member. That's a pressure sales tactic for sure!

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1tnw+12dmaCm6

I get personal calls from a VP every year. No matter what the VP says that is a pressure sales tactic and it impacts their opinion of the people they call. Now that I can see who it is I just don’t answer. Ethically grey and gives the appearance of “quid pro quo” in today’s meme language.

I wonder if anyone has tried legal action against lobbyists who pushed through a damaging policy change like that FAA privatization?

We should follow Microsoft and just not support. Ask mother honeywell to publish talking points and research on their own nickel .. in the open. We can donate directly.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1gyf+12dmaCm6

How do you think the FAA got "privatized"?

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1xrm+12dmaCm6

Although they have a no retaliation policy if you don't contribute, they keep lists and know who has given and who hasn't. Saw an exec throw up a PP in a staff meeting with names of targeted employees (to contribute) and the VPs who were assigned to get them to do that. Lots of pressure. Pathetic.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1efi+12dmaCm6

https://wikileaks.org/dnc-emails/emailid/22332
this email ended my participation. whole thing is shady.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1yyr+12dmaCm6

how many foreign nationals donate again?

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1hhg+12dmaCm6

It’s a f—ing scam and they use YOUR own money to lobby against you and your own self interests. Just. Say.No!

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @fap+12dmaCm6

It will probably jeopardize my career, but they will never get a dime from me!

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @zqa+12dmaCm6

Post a reply

: