Thread regarding Xerox Corp. layoffs

Could anybody have imagined 9 or 10 years ago it would come to this?

I certainly couldn’t. I find it tragic what this company has become and the fact that it has the potential to sink even lower, and we used to be a great company. I imagine that the professors at business schools will use xerox as an example how not to run a company.

by
| 1854 views | | 10 replies (last May 1, 2019) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+YMzE33a

10 replies (most recent on top)

Seemed pretty obvious to me that this was a likely destination. Xerox seemed like a dinosaur in decline back when I started in the mid 90's.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @4qcj+YMzE33a

@sxo professors don't know what they're talking about. XRX was forced by the US government to open their patent portfolio to the Ricohs, Epsons, and Fujis of the world because it was a monopoly. That's when the fall really began.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @3krj+YMzE33a

Beginning with Paul Allaire senior management had NO VISION.Through the

80’s and 90’s Xerox had the best products,

a talented and loyal workforce second to none ...Products like the 9700, Docutech,

and later I-Gen were unmatched in the industry.By 2000 with layoffs, outsourcing and plant closures Xerox had lost it path

and soul sinking year over year to the

shell of a mess it is today ..So Sorry.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1qtl+YMzE33a

YES....not surprising at all !

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1dfy+YMzE33a

They've been doing this every CEO going back since the 90s when the company has 90k employees. It's just more vocal now.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1lxw+YMzE33a

Ursula was hand picked by A Mulcahy. Backed by the Board. In many ways they were both about a cult of personality. Both were promoted and fawned over by the business editors. Mulcahy pulled Xerox back from the edge but after that there wasn’t any real substance. UMB was all about herself and funding a hopeless services business with a shrinking print/copy business. Neither one of them made good decisions about the print/copy business. The other players, Ricoh, KM, HP and especially Canon, trimmed but kept investing in products. It wasn’t hard to see where it was going ... it was predicted by many when the new technologies were rolling and Xerox had nothing new (or nothing new that worked, in some cases)

Between the well documented days of “fumbling the future” at PARC and the recent declines, Xerox did some great things.

But it is still hard to see the end actually unfolding. Sad, indeed.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @uuc+YMzE33a

Too bad Xerox’s priority was to have a diversity figure as CEO vs having chosen the best person for the job.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @vmk+YMzE33a

Was pretty easy to see the end was coming once Ursula was placed on top. No leadership, no vision, incompetence.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @wwm+YMzE33a

I feel the same way, but I hold the memories of my better colleagues, teamwork and successes close to my heart. They are the way things should be.

It’s best to move on. That standard will never again be met at X.

Good luck.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @lev+YMzE33a

'I imagine that the professors at business schools will use xerox as an example how not to run a company.'

They already do: https://www.amazon.com/Fumbling-Future-Invented-Personal-Computer-ebook/dp/B0791LWDG3

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @sxo+YMzE33a

Post a reply

: