I am with the organization for long time, and I left about 2 years ago. I setup my outsourcing business, and now, I can make close to 8 digits profit.
Everyone putting the blame that the IT landscape is changing. Yes it is changing, but problem is not with the change. Whenever there is a change, there is opportunity.
Problem with DXC is very visible. Only idiot can't see it well.
1) Mike Larrie is old and stupid, taking too much of the bonus during hard time.
2) Whole new Level 1 and Level 2, need to be removed from the DXC organization. Easily able to reduce 100 million USD of recurring cost.
3) Wrong direction and strategy.
4) Because L1 and L2 is way too expensive, how can you compete with India. Move the HQ to Asia is a wise direction. Put the management in Singapore or in Malaysia.
5) By doing all the above, it will benefit AMS and EMEA region, better profit margin, cheaper solution for end user, and more sustainable DXC.
Theory is simple:-
You can cut someone in AMS, that might be worth USD150,000
You can cut someone in EMEA, that might be worth USD 130,000
You can cut someone in India, that might be worth USD25,000
You can cut someone in the rest of Asia, that might be worth USD20,000 avg.
But if you cut Mike Larrie, easily save USD15,000,000.
That is equal to 100 AMS resources. By common sense, the board assumption is 100 American is less intelligent than Mike. (American, you all idiot)
EMEA, you more idiot.
Indian, you extreme idiot.
Asian, you are totally retarded.
Do you think this statement is correct?
Satya Nadella can be CEO. China company can grow much better.
DXC claims that their previous HPE cloud failed because it is late. Too slow in execution.
But infact, Alibaba introduce Alicloud this year, and they are moving in the right direction.
It is not about being the first people or the last people, as long as you have right direction, you can success.
Fact proved that the management is disabled. No brain, no intelligent, another word STUPID. (TOP management is real idiot FACT 1)
General motor produce car in 1908. Toyota produce car in 1937. Close to 3 decades. But they are most successful manufacturer now. It is not about who start first, but who can continue run longer. (Top management is real idiot FACT 2)
CSC started as IT company 1959, Google started during 1998, Facebook year 2004. You can compare it now. (Who is the idiot?)
Why keep blaming the top?
1) Company direction is coming from top, when it failed, it is because of the top person. When it success, it is because the top person. Now very visible that the whole company is going to drain. But the top person is cutting the bottom, to show that he is hero that can sustain the company. Chopping people job and think that he did a great job is just exactly same with insane killer that kill and rape a bunch of woman and assume he is the greatest man in the world.
2) Apple success and fail upon steve leaving the company, once steve back, apple successfully regain reputation and growing (proof the important of real quality leader), because of his innovation. DXC, no innovation. Cutting people is not innovation. When business is not doing well, you need to find a blue ocean strategy, to grow the company in the right direction, and not stuck yourself in red ocean.
3) Cutting headcount is temporary win. When you left nothing to cut, it is too late to recover. Only stupid older generation will think that it is still the right way to go. Now is 2017, please wake up. This is not 1950 anymore.
DXC want to be real success? Change them. Use brain and think, what is really right and what is wrong.
Easily if i want to continue, i can write a book of "incompetent old man dragging the company to hell".
Please wake up investor, please wake up american, please wake up everyone!