Thread regarding Cigna layoffs

Pharmaceutical tariffs

Recent proposals for a 100% tariff on imported branded and patented pharmaceuticals will likely increase costs for Express Scripts by raising the acquisition price of dr-gs it manages.

As a pharmacy benefit manager (PBM), Express Scripts' business model depends on managing dr-g costs for its clients, and the tariff would disrupt its negotiations and supply chain.

The specifics of the tariff proposal, announced by former President Donald Trump in late September 2025, suggest the following potential effects on Express Scripts:

Higher dr-g costs: Express Scripts' profitability comes from its ability to negotiate rebates and discounts with dr-g manufacturers. The tariff on imported patented dr-gs would significantly raise the base price for many brand-name medications, potentially undermining or negating any savings the PBM can achieve.

Negotiation challenges: The tariff could dramatically alter Express Scripts' negotiating power with foreign pharmaceutical companies. While some large manufacturers may absorb the costs in the short term, they would likely seek to pass increases to PBMs and insurers over time, which would then affect their clients' premiums.

Supply chain disruption: The pharmaceutical supply chain is complex and global, and a 100% tariff could cause major disruptions, especially for specialized or critical medications. A dr-g shortage, exacerbated by a tariff, could force Express Scripts to direct patients toward more expensive alternative medications, further increasing costs.

Reduced competition: Generic dr-gs are excluded from the tariff, but the cost for generics could also increase, as manufacturers with thin profit margins may exit the U.S. market rather than pay the new import tax. This reduced competition could also remove a tool Express Scripts uses to keep costs down.

Uncertainty and potential for industry adaptation: The full impact is not yet clear. The tariff includes an exception for companies that are building manufacturing plants in the U.S., which has already prompted some manufacturers to announce domestic investments. If many manufacturers adapt, the long-term impact on Express Scripts could be different from the immediate, short-term price shock. The PBM will have to adapt its strategies to address these changes.

For Express Scripts, this situation creates significant risk by driving up the very costs it is designed to manage. How it adapts will depend on the final implementation of the tariffs, the response of pharmaceutical manufacturers, and the extent to which higher costs are ultimately passed on to its clients and consumers.


by
| 2694 views | | 10 replies (last September 30) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+1k63epg7n

10 replies (most recent on top)

@wr Noted and for the record, calling out an actual mistake is insight. Meanwhile, you’ve spent the thread criticizing others without offering a single point on the policy itself. 👀”

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @wt+1k63epg7n

@wn

again for those in the back - ONLY sniping an error and wheeling on out with a giggle isn't adding much. no one is saying to ignore it. absolutely bring it up and then try to add some insight.

i guess you do you, though 👋

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @wr+1k63epg7n

@wg calling out an inaccuracy isn’t ‘horsesh-t,’ it’s basic fact-checking. If pointing out errors ruffles feathers, maybe the focus should be on the analysis itself, not the messenger

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @wn+1k63epg7n

@wb

pointing out the error only, and dropping a smug emoji on one's way out the door is a horsesh-t approach.

but I'm sure you realized that already...

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @wg+1k63epg7n

Pointing out the error is valid, accuracy builds credibility. That said, the real conversation is about the impact of a 100% tariff on dr-g costs and patient access.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @wb+1k63epg7n

@w3

wow - you caught one minor error in a multi-paragraph item and just couldn't wait to post your "victory", complete with a nifty emoji...

any real insights on the situation or was that the limit of your capabilities?

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @w7+1k63epg7n

@am
True ESI the pbm doesn’t buy/hold dr-gs, but ESI is also the mail order pharmacy and most definitely stocks tons of dr-gs. Same for the Accredo side. Even on pbm side, clients paying more for dr-gs leaves them less room to pay ESI in future. The bottom line will be hit hard no matter which side of the company you talk about.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @t0+1k63epg7n

This was clearly written by ai 🙄

I would think it would increase costs for the consumer and the cigna insurance company.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @n5+1k63epg7n

Express Scripts wouldn’t be directly hurt by a 100% tariff on imported branded dr-gs. PBMs don’t import or hold inventory—they negotiate rebates and manage formularies. If tariffs raise list prices, the cost lands on health plans, employers, and patients, not Express Scripts. In fact, higher list prices can expand rebate margins. Generics are also excluded from the tariff, so competition there remains intact.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @am+1k63epg7n

Some of my branded medications come from Canada, and generics come from India. I will have to take a look at the proposal to see if that is 100% for all imports, or per country rate.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @aa+1k63epg7n

Post a reply

: