How is Intel more efficient when I spent all 8 hours today approving entitlements for people in this AGS system. Is this efficiency?
14 replies (most recent on top)
You don't need to be efficient at Intel. Take as much time as you need. Nobody cares how long you spend on what.
@w1 yes indeed
@w0 do they still have a cluster of incompetent principle engineers and managers with no real experience gatekeeping a broken internal CA?
Add to the list Intels slow a-s code signing system that impacts my dev group daily just another steaming pile with seaming no plan to fix
the Access Governance System is symptomatic of the entire automation infrastructure of the company. It is fundamentally broken and conceptually flawed. The fact that you are still using it means that nothing has changed. Your factory automation is rotten to the core.
Again, the problem is procedures for AGS are extremely inefficient.
It not my job to know AGS perhaps the people that own the AGS product should fix it and enable the rest of the business?
Excellent time submit improvement idea to address issue. Determine roi and push for a fix. Things like this are your chance to speak up and offer a soloution. Win win for you and the company.
if it takes all day it means more employment for me. thank you. if i become more efficient they will lay some of us off.
Why does it take 2 weeks for access? Also, we've been struggling for months to get provisioning approved from IT for our customer. You guys pass the blame/ownership around more than a quarterback... 5 escalations later...
@a6, are you even working at Intel? Don't you know that 90% of all accesses are obtained through AGS?
Wait! Bots are paid?!
It’s more efficient because they’re now paying only one person to do the work of three people. Enough to keep the ELT bonuses coming for a few more quarters.
AGS, really? It's a one time approval for a necessary security feature. Also how is it taking you 8 hours to click two buttons?