@vtr+1tjws69t and @1xtj+1tjws69t I could write something about this now, but that would violate thelayoff.com rules, as this is internal company business.
The problems you mentioned are all home-made. The managers (I can only speak from my point of view) have long ago stopped giving the impression that they are protecting their team members, but are now only carrying out administrative tasks, which consist of conducting the half-yearly meetings.
This leads to a climate of mistrust among employees, perhaps also a climate of fear: What happens if I tell my manager that I only have 50% work per day? Will I end up on the layoff list? Or will my manager do everything in his power to get me into projects?
I don't get the impression that the managers do the latter. Is that because they no longer have time for it because their teams are getting bigger and bigger? Is it because DXC doesn't have a system where team managers can enter "I have someone here with these skills who can be used 20 hours a week" and where project managers can search "Is there anyone in this company with these skills?"
Team managers have to manage their teams properly, and that includes placing them in projects.
DXC has to understand that employees can sometimes only be 50% busy for a few months. After a certain period of time, the manager would have to answer questions, he would have to prove that he did everything he could to place the person in a project, and he would have to be able to explain why it didn't work. And if he can't do that, then he can't be a manager! I think if DXC were to do a real anonymous survey on how busy the employees in real, the results would be shocking.
At the moment, everyone is trying to have 100% capacity on paper so that they don't end up on the layoff list, even if they're only actually working 50%. And when someone looks for support, all they see is "Oh, they're already working 100%, they can't do any more." It's an absolutely stupid system.