Thread regarding Chevron Corp. layoffs

Inadequate managers…

This is the perspective of a mid career, ~25 years petrotech-subsurface total experience, ~ 2 with Chevron.
What I have noticed is that:

  • I am surrounded by top talent at my level (individual contributor), which motivates me to work hard and get aligned to their excellent work and project deliverables.
  • Top manager is fine: despite the general negativity in this forum, they are just blindly executing orders from the board and director and CEO, they are sailing the big CVX cruise ship where the ticket-paying passengers request. We may not like nor enjoy this (I do not personally), but they are “performing” as requested.
  • First line managers and supervisor: this is where the rotten layer is. How the phuc are we being managed and assessed by largely inadequate and misplaced people that is very comfortable saying things like“please explain me what you do as you would do to an high-school student”? These folks should be there for their technical merits and excellence, and should be able to teach all of us something. Unfortunately that’s not the case.

Now, the most diabolical amongst you can argue that point 3 is a consequence of point 2 being untrue (top management responsible for parasites useless supervisors and managers). While I think this may be true on a limited basis, I still can’t see how it became a systematic occurrence. Looking forward to hearing the thought of the seasoned Chevron workforce.

by
| 2861 views | | 14 replies (last December 20, 2024) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+1w2hGqar

14 replies (most recent on top)

@2rvr+1w2hGqar I love that proposal and really wish someone would apply it to my supervisor. This person made it pretty clear to the team that their role was all about building relationships, not actually understanding the department’s function (like Reserves, for example). Staff were told to go to them if they needed an escalation, but of course, we had to document everything starting with the situation, the concern, the support needed, the whole nine yards. If we didn’t get a response via email, we were expected to follow up on Teams a few days later. Oh, and the best part? We were advised to try resolving things with peers first, because escalations from the Manager's PSG level might cause people to panic. Classic. This person is held in high regard by the completely clueless chain of command though, and I’m sure they’re well compensated for doing pretty much nothing for the team. But hey, what’s new?

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @2bmo+1w2hGqar

My supervisor is very passionate about connecting me with others, removing blockers, and IDK asking inspirational questions during their dozen 1:1 meetings a week. That’s certainly worth their ~$300-350k pay. Such value…, give me a break.
I propose a policy of demotion unless you stick your neck out with clear and robust strategies (seriously someone show me a real strategy in this company), drive technical excellence, and pull your weight.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @2rvr+1w2hGqar

@1qwn+1w2hGqar Definitely! Downvoting posts instead of embracing a feedback-rich culture? Typical—this leader’s idea of feedback is just shutting people down.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1pbl+1w2hGqar

@oip+1w2hGqar 😂 ABU SCM?

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1qwn+1w2hGqar

ABU SCM has just signed off on an expensive long term rotational role despite much cheaper and more productive options. The lack of critical thinking and efficiency is farcical. If senior ABU management thinks value for money is a key driver in this BU, they are dreaming.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @1jbv+1w2hGqar

It’s funny how some managers act like they’re running a fan club instead of leading a team—competence isn’t the threat, their own egos are. Lack of credibility anywhere outside of the ABU and an inflated sense of worth, diminishing those who actually provide diversity of thought and don’t just nod like a donkey.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @waf+1w2hGqar

ABU leaders sure are the epitome of integrity! Who wouldn’t admire the MARC leader who sleeps with his wife’s friend and then has the audacity to paint himself as the victim? Truly inspirational!

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @oip+1w2hGqar

Who would have known there's a correlation between the ABU and inadequate managers? Aside from those in the ABU that is.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @tys+1w2hGqar

Hey me too, for now!

Let’s get lunch over at Allendale or when next on Barrow.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @zwe+1w2hGqar

Yes, I am in ABU.
Maybe you know me.
Maybe we even get lunch together sometime ?

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @wuc+1w2hGqar

In my experience supervisors are often good as are upper management. The problem comes with middle management which is all the deadwood psg 27-29 who can neither do nor understand nor lead. They just administer and politic. It’s horrifying.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @mle+1w2hGqar

Chevron is unwilling to fire those that they've invested in. This creates a layer of 1L/2L managers with major technical, managerial, or strategic gaps (otherwise they would have been promoted further).

This compounds with the fact that said 1L/2L managers see the writing on the wall (they'll never be promoted) and tend to check out as a result.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @sax+1w2hGqar

Too many DEI and HIPOT promotions into front line supervisor / manager positions . Many of these folks have spent so little time in prior positions that they have not developed adequate leadership and supervisory skill sets

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @yiq+1w2hGqar

"When you have eliminated the impossible, whatever remains, however improbable, must be the truth." – Sherlock Holmes

This insight seems to ring true when considering the dynamics within the organization, especially when it comes to management and team culture. In a lot of cases, our typical managers and the PDR community prioritize loyalty and personal validation over actual competence and performance. They tend to be insecure, favoring employees who flatter them or agree with their every decision, rather than those who challenge ideas or bring fresh perspectives. The fear of being overshadowed by more capable individuals leads these managers to promote sycophants who pose no threat to their authority. The result is a toxic culture where merit and skill are sidelined in favor of maintaining a comfortable, unquestioning environment.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @srb+1w2hGqar

Post a reply

: