Again, it's odd that posts related to the qualifications of executive leadership are deleted immediately. One was based directly upon the bank's own public proxy statement. Leadership can't be so thin skinned that they can't stand own their own qualifications (or lack thereof) and thus requests deletion of posts about them. Are they afraid of the shareholders finding out? Didn't the shareholders approve them already??
11 replies (most recent on top)
of course exec qualifications can't be questioned, when they are fake censorship is necessary for their existence
notice that half the diversity have "consulting companies" named after them, e.g. ABCD Group, ABCD Solutions...
@k0 They all look like inbreds.
Such a diverse BOD. Shame almost none of that diversity includes consumer/commercial banking experience. How can they select Officer level management of a bank without any experience operating a bank?
https://ir.usbank.com/governance/board-of-directors/default.aspx
Holy schnikes. Her bonus is 350% of her salary???
@ae Why repost this when it doesn't even come close to describing what was posted?
Copy-pasting someone’s post about deletions:
- posts don't get deleted because some corporate clown dislikes them
posts do get deleted for for ToS violations, like if:
a lot of f-words are used
- personal insults are used
- if a non-public person is named (or initialed)
- some posters might get banned/can’t post for a while, i guess changing IP helps with that one.
@a3 Google "U.S. Bancorp proxy statement 2025" and when you open the pdf scroll down to page 12. Read from there.
You’ve seen what?
@a1 Do you have a link to the proxy statement in question?
I’ve seen that. She’s unqualified and they are scrambling.