Thread regarding Chevron Corp. layoffs

Hess

Private arbitration hearing between Exxon/CNOOC and CVX start Monday in London. By August or September, the panel will decide whether Exxon and another partner in Guyana, China’s Cnooc, have the right to counter Chevron’s bid for Hess’s 30% stake in a generational oil discovery of 11 billion barrels of oil and gas.

For Chevron, the arbitration is a must-win. Hess is a big player in the Bakken Shale of North Dakota, but its crown jewel is Guyana. Hess’s share of the Guyana project could be worth some $40 billion, analysts estimated last year.

by
| 3743 views | | 17 replies (last July 1) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+1jw598d40

17 replies (most recent on top)

@cx all companies have agreed to the decision of the arbitration - no appeals courts would be involved - the arbitrator's decision is final.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @5ew+1jw598d40

@dw Exxon has stated they do not want to buy Hess

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @5ev+1jw598d40

@hk

As I mentioned, I saw this up real close. Back around 2009, Chevron was more of a team, not us vs them, and some 26+ execs were pretty open about the game plan.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @k0+1jw598d40

In the unlikely event Exxon needs a favor from Chevron at some point in the future, good luck! Karma is real...

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @hx+1jw598d40

@cx

You said:
"I felt better when Watson ("we will fight them until he-l freezes over and then we will fight them on ice skates") incurred the cost to take down Donzinger and the other scammers on the Ecuador lawsuit."

I saw the whole thing go down. Chevron's lawyers bulldozed everyone in their way and what they did to Donziger probably was illegal. I don't think that is going to happen with Exxon.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @hb+1jw598d40

Recent Ex Chevron Employee here:
this is likely XOM being opportunistic in a no-lose situation, either they win or they delay CVX-Hess merger preserving their bonuses (exec bonuses especially will be relative to their peer group) tying up CVX funds/M&A activity, bad press, investor uncertainty etc. and who knows maybe the size and scope of this ROM is partially to do with CVX freeing up funds for any potential concession or any sweetener to get the deal through.

Interestingly enough XOM has their own ENGINE also in Bangalore, so competition for Hess/Guyana is not the only thing in play, but so is access to cheaper offshore tech centers. Both companies now have >150 job postings in India and very little in US.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @e6+1jw598d40

Chevron will win this easily. They should then pursue damages from Exxon

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @e0+1jw598d40

would serve Chevron right if Exxon Mobil were to buy Hess

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @dw+1jw598d40

If XOM loses in arbitration doesn't it appeal in the courts?

Does CVX incur the cost to litigate or look to compromise and give XOM a settlement of some kind?

I felt better when Watson ("we will fight them until he-l freezes over and then we will fight them on ice skates") incurred the cost to take down Donzinger and the other scammers on the Ecuador lawsuit. Mike Wirth..... don't give in to Exxon !

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @cx+1jw598d40

The Hess entity that holds the rights to Guyana isn’t being dissolved or sold. It will continue to exist as a subsidiary of CVX.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @cn+1jw598d40

All these posts about “chevron” will win. Cvx is not part of the arbitration….its Exxon/cnooc vs Hess.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @ck+1jw598d40

Win or lose, it’s a significant short-term hit to Chevron (if they win) and short and long term hit if they lose. Who is going to be held accountable for this debacle?

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @c9+1jw598d40

Chevron will win. This was strategic by Exxon to bog Chevron down and extract some concessions in exchange for dropping the challenge. It was a no-lose for Exxon to challenge and drag it out, preventing Chevron from any further M&A activity

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @c5+1jw598d40

Exxon has smarter lawyers.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @c3+1jw598d40

Chevron is likely to win the arbitration. The arbitration panel will probably interpret the ROFR clause narrowly, ruling that Chevron's corporate merger with Hess does not trigger Exxon's right of first refusal, given historical precedents and typical interpretations of similar clauses. However, Exxon likely pursued arbitration strategically to create market uncertainty, negotiation leverage, and operational disruption for Chevron, even if losing the legal battle.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @c1+1jw598d40

Chevrons going to lose

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @c0+1jw598d40

Thanks

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @bv+1jw598d40

Post a reply

: