Thread regarding Wells Fargo & Co. layoffs

Wells Fargo Lifts Hiring Bonuses for Advisors Hitting Asset-Transfer Targets

There you go...


Wells Fargo Lifts Hiring Bonuses for Advisors Hitting Asset-Transfer Targets

Wells Fargo Advisors has enhanced its already elevated recruiting offer by adding asset-transfer and growth targets that can bring cash bonuses for top brokers up to 3.4 times the 12-month revenue produced at their former firms.

The catch in the new arrangement is that the upfront cash that brokers receive on Day One of their arrival has been lowered to 180% of their trailing-12-month production (T-12) from 200%. Wells is putting more emphasis on back-end performance targets, as measured by assets they attract over three years.

It will pay an additional 50% of T-12 to brokers who transfer 70% of their assets by the end of their sixth month, and another 30% at the end of each of their first, second and third years for hitting further asset-growth targets.

The performance-based change makes business sense at a time when Wells Fargo & Co.’s new management has introduced efficiency plans, including layoffs that led it to take $718 million of third-quarter restructuring charges, primarily for severance.

From a competitive point of view, Wells’ enhanced deal could pressure rivals such as Ameriprise Financial and Morgan Stanley that have been aggressive recruiters to stretch further, headhunters said.

Wells Fargo Advisors’ efforts to bolster its diminished ranks following the scandal has positioned it ahead of rivals on recruiting deals. It raised the top deal to 325% of T-12 in 2019, and also enticed headhunters by paying them up to 10% of a brokers’ trailing-12 month production for successful introductions, compared to industry standards of around 6%.

A Wells spokeswoman declined to comment on whether it would extend the sweetened offers to recruiters, which are set to expire at the end of the year.

“We continually assess and re-evaluate our recruiting deal in the context of the marketplace,” the spokeswoman said.

Wells Fargo had 12,908 brokers across its private client, bank and independent contractor advisory channels as of September 30, down by 2,718 from three years ago. The count was off a net 815 in the past year alone, but the bank has said that average annual production of recruits in the past year is about 30% higher than of brokers who left.

Last week, Wells Fargo Advisors recruited brokers from UBS and Merrill Lynch who each had over $2 million in annual production.

Good luck enticing the bottom of the barrel and old washed up hacks who are looking for a plan out. Weak and weaker. Go independent and stop relying on the weak banks. You’re almost as sad as Bank of America advisors…almost.

This should go over well with the loyal FA’s who have stuck with Wells – hey we’re going to cut your comp so we can bring on desperate FA’s looking for a check!

Industry focused content and breaking news.

by
| 1962 views | | 5 replies (last November 4, 2020) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+17L3LqGt

5 replies (most recent on top)

To those that dont think the FAs are important to the business they might want to look at the margins in WIM vs those other LOBs instead of just the net income.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @idc+17L3LqGt

Post ID: @ejo+17L3LqGt from Post ID: @fhc+17L3LqGt

I am not suggesting that our FAS think too highly of themselves. I am calling out a pretentious commenter on their bs for attempting to promote the false idea that FAs are not valuable to the bank. (I am amazed that people who clearly know nothing about the business insist on flapping their gums.)

You keep on living a good life. Best wishes.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @nca+17L3LqGt

I would not work anywhere else in the bank. Not management, not consumer, not Private Bank, not CIB. Whether I'm as valuable to the enterprise as the commercial or retail group is inconsequential to me. What matters most is my bottom line, and the more I make the more the firm makes. Win/win. And win for my family because the job allows for work/life balance.

I don't think too highly of myself. I know there are bigger FA's and bank executives that make more money...that's ok.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @ejo+17L3LqGt

I’m going to go with “they think too highly of themselves.” Many grew up in the decade where Every Kid Gets a Prize. They were made to feel special just for showing up. Mediocrity was unintentionally rewarded and they never developed crucial character traits such as dependability and trustworthiness.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @ioc+17L3LqGt

Several days ago, I had the opportunity to engage with a commenter who persisted with their opinion that Financial Advisors “really aren’t important to the bank.” See just one of his/her comments below:

“The person who keeps posting about FAs really needs to spend some time looking at the bank’s financial statements. Consumer contributes 3.5 times and Commercial contributes 5 times as much net income as WIM. And, retail (non FA) assets in WIM are 3 times the size of FA assets. Sorry, but this segment really isn’t that important to the bank. WF is fundamentally a mass market bank, no one cares about FAs leaving. They should probably exit that business anyway.”

This is just an example, but my experience is that the most patronizing people are more often than not: wrong. Is it that they think too highly of themselves, or is it they are insecure and looking for ways to demonstrate their superiority to make themselves feel better. I don’t need to know the answer, but I’m done with arrogant snobs.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @fhc+17L3LqGt

Post a reply

: