Thread regarding Nike Inc. layoffs

Why You Don’t Want IDSA to Fall…

Careful What You Wish For: In Defense of IDSA

At every large company, there's a common refrain: the centralized analytics organization is a slow, bureaucratic bottleneck. The calls to dismantle IDSA and embed analysts directly into the business have grown louder every quarter since I’ve been here. It’s a tempting idea. It’s also a terrible one.
Before you champion the downfall of IDSA, consider the function they serve beyond building dashboards—a function governments honestly perfected long ago: the role of the scapegoat.

The Problems Don’t Disappear, They Relocate…

You think the analytics org is slow? Do you believe it’s because hundreds of people are collectively lazy? Poor Leadership? Or is it the tangled web of poor data systems, corporate red tape, constant re-orgs, and knowledge loss they contend with daily? These systemic issues won’t vanish with a new org chart. They will simply become your problem. The frustration you feel now will be the same frustration your embedded analyst feels later, except now they report to you. Guess what, you also have poor leadership…

The Work—and the Blame—Becomes Yours
Leadership’s appetite for data is infinite. When the central team is gone, those requests don’t stop. They land on your desk. This means one of two things:

  • * Your workload increases. You or your team will be expected to learn how to wrangle data from Snowflake, Excel, and Databricks. It will be framed as a "career growth opportunity," but it won't come with a raise.
  • * Your budget shrinks. If you hire dedicated analysts, their higher salaries come from your finite budget. That’s money that could have gone to raises for your current team, new roles for career advancement, or travel and team-building funds.

And when a report fails to refresh, numbers don't match, or the backlog moves too slowly, there is no one else to point to. The scapegoat is gone. You are the new reason things are broken.

You Already Have the Perfect Arrangement…
Think about your current process. You come up with the requirements, hand them off, and then present the finished project to leadership as a win. You get the credit without the grind. If you own the analytics yourself, you might move faster on one project, but good work is only rewarded with more work. You’ll get the same strategic win, but with an added mountain of technical debt and support tasks.

In a culture where influence and likeability often matter more than pure output, remember this: nobody ever resents the business leader who presents the data. They resent the team that tells them the data is messy and it will take three weeks.

IDSA is your shield. They absorb the blame for systemic failures too complex and politically charged to solve. Keep the scapegoat. Be glad it’s there. (Actually, sc--w it. Lay us off, and rehire us as ETWs making 1.5x what we were and soak up your budget. The Nike way)

by
| 2973 views | | 28 replies (last July 24) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+1k0pw20ts

28 replies (most recent on top)

As someone in IDSA - DC needs to go. He’s got no clue what he’s doing and the only reason he kept his job is because if there was anyone less qualified to run an analytics function than him, it was Amy White.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @n0+1k0pw20ts

@m5 IDSA under operations and merch not Tech

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @mx+1k0pw20ts

@fz you must not work here IDSA is a part of tech
And their leaders are actually good, it’s “the business” that doesn’t understand how to partner better

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @m5+1k0pw20ts

@aw 100%

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @jt+1k0pw20ts

Functions like IDSA exist in many companies. The problem is not the org, it’s the leaders and how SB and DC delivered negative ROI unchecked for years and we expect the same VPs and a few same SD to now be different.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @gy+1k0pw20ts

No we don't want anymore Indians on the team....

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @g4+1k0pw20ts

What this post tells me is that people don’t know the difference between Tech and IDSA…

Even more of a reason you don’t want this work on your team.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @fz+1k0pw20ts

@f4 I guess people in the company does more work than what you see.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @fs+1k0pw20ts

@er what does IDSA do I just get presentations about sales.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @f4+1k0pw20ts

@dx if you think it’s just sales numbers, then you have no idea how retail works.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @er+1k0pw20ts

It’s hard to say who’s fault is when you can’t have even 75% of your data in the same place (or maybe is not hard to say), but it’s not IDSA. But is easy to say how hard is to do work on strategic analysis under those circumstances.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @ec+1k0pw20ts

They have already been disbanded, all important functions have come to GT

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @e9+1k0pw20ts

Shouldn’t SEC fix all of this …

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @e7+1k0pw20ts

No one needs insights people to tell them sales numbers. Just need better dashboards and AI. That org needs to go.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @dx+1k0pw20ts

@ay segmentation hasn’t been touched for over a year, who are you even talking to. It wasn’t even an IDSA thing.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @cr+1k0pw20ts

@b6 IDSA does not manage software and would love one platform instead of the mess we have to work with from tech

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @ch+1k0pw20ts

Think about MN, he got all his leadership and management coaching from SB.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @c6+1k0pw20ts

@bd You were obviously in the last layoff and you need to move on.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @bm+1k0pw20ts

IDSA leadership is full of talentless SB su-k ups like MN and SD. Most of the leadership got promoted for licking boots, that’s why they need to be disbanded, the entire structure is rotten to the core.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @bd+1k0pw20ts

Nike still runs Teradata for analytics after spending $ on AWS, Snowflake, Databricks and many other vendors.

IDSA, Architecture and EDAI and teams managing those softwares should be shown door.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @b6+1k0pw20ts

What a nerd. Nike doesn’t need IDSA. The business just needs easy dashboards not million dollar segmentation projects that go no where.

DISBAND IDSA

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @ay+1k0pw20ts

Our data is terrible because we allow VP's to bring in their pet vendors so we have ENDLESS legacy software that just never stops.

Think you had data problems now? Lets add in 3 more versions of the tool and see how that goes. Retire older tools? NOPE.

We just buy new ones and leave the old ones hanging... sometimes in the Production critical path.

I say there needs to be a bigger authority that approves new software AND the hard requirement for getting approval is that it includes a decommission plan for the software it's replacing. See that word? REPLACING... ie: the old goes, the new one is it.

It's pork barrel IT at it's finest... which is hilarious with all the "layoffs decided by accountings Excel spreadsheets" happening.

OH... fun bonus of all the new software? We get to filter and fix and figure out all the new data issues and transforms and... hmmm... how DO I get that data in the right format now? Using 10's-100's of employees people.

But hey at least the VP got a free trip to Vegas... you know for that Switch "demo".

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @aw+1k0pw20ts

IDSA has become a scapegoat just like Ai-ML teams back in the day, they can't afford to touch engineering teams, but insights can be built in excel sheets too, so IDSA peeps go expand your career where your work is valued!

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @ar+1k0pw20ts

Without those people from other countries, America would have become a sh*thole. No wonder Nike employees have become so pathetic

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @am+1k0pw20ts

That is what we get for off shoring to a third world sh-t hole and bringing millions of h1bs

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @af+1k0pw20ts

@ab Isn't that org mostly white people?

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @ae+1k0pw20ts

IDSA is lazy and blames everyone else but themselves. They blew millions of $ for almost 15 years under the leadership of DC without bringing any maturity, consistency across the company. They are not scapgoat, they are the problem.

Another problem is bloated EDAI organization.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @ab+1k0pw20ts

Why did you make this post? Or am I failing to understand the underlying sarcasm

Summarizing your post we can either:

  1. Keep a failed leadership and ownership structure because… it lets badly operating teams to continue doing their job poorly.
  1. Simplify ownership structures so engineering teams can’t shift blame and team failures will become even more clear.

OP. Your misunderstanding is that we actually hate your aforementioned squads even more than IDSA. They’re the ones that let S1 incidents sit for hours, forcing the rest of us to sit quietly on a call from 2am until 7am when someone finally answers our frantic calls. They’re the ones that never switch platforms despite repeated deprecation notifications. They’re the ones playing politics to claim wins they had no part in creating.

This reorg will hurt some teams? Good. Growth requires pain.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @a3+1k0pw20ts

Post a reply

: