Thread regarding Intel Corp. layoffs

If CEO LBT does not work full time, why he layoff people for RTO?

LBT owns tons of companies. If he only works part time, why he layoff people working 60 hours per week by excuse of RTO?


by
| 33 views | | 9 replies (last April 5) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+1knb2c4c3

9 replies (most recent on top)

@gx there were a lot of metrics involved in ACT, including the site size. If they decide to close sites with <500 population again, it doesn't matter at all whether you were at the office 0 or 5 days a week.

I remember a guy who got a giant inheritance and waived his stock grant during the focal in favor of younger teammates. He was sacked during ACT since 0 stock is worse than BE.

We're nothing but spreadsheet rows for the bean counters like LaBuBu, so stop overthinking it

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @ha+1knb2c4c3

@fr
And they are playing a dangerous game.
Just remember 2015 to see what the company is willing to do.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @gx+1knb2c4c3

Who says that they're doing RTO-based layoffs? I know a lot of people who are formally hybrid (me included) who ignore RTO without consequences

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @fr+1knb2c4c3

To @cn and @da, get right.

"It's a big club, and you ain't in it".
George Carlin.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @ej+1knb2c4c3

@dx
it is like felon musk who has 12 kids
if he spends an hour a day with each kid trying to be a halfway decent father
how can he do any work

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @dy+1knb2c4c3

It's a big club, and your not in it.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @cn+1knb2c4c3

I’m just waiting for them to hire a 3rd party company to make cuts based on metrics handed over by Intel. The RTO percentage doesn’t incorporate MLOA and that’s not captured. So when looking at raw numbers only and making decisions on that…. OOOpsie

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @cj+1knb2c4c3

The id--t doesn't have to work. It just collect your money on your slavery work to sit around and bullsh-t all days. There is no office to return after layoffs.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @c8+1knb2c4c3

Post a reply

: