Thread regarding L3Harris Technologies layoffs

L3Hasnt

L3Harris is dead. The point of the L3+Harris merger and any goal has fully blown up, and all executive leadership and a lot more has turned over multiple times. There's no one left in upper mgmt who knows what actually works, and especially no one left who respects the scientists and engineers who made it happen. All history has been thrown away, to transform the company into a cash extraction hedge fund.

If you're hanging on to the way things were, it's long gone. If you're waiting for things to improve, best hope for a quick divestiture to a buyer that's not another hedge fund.


by
| 34 views | | 15 replies (last April 8) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+1km1rczq7

15 replies (most recent on top)

@cb

And all the earned KM is to be labeled the scapegoat for the rest of the C-Level and Board level deciding that switching to managed service model for Corporate/IHO IT was a great idea.

It will not surprise me if L3Harris gets bought up by someone like UTC and they slice and dice selloff assets in a firesale and walk away with the cash and collapse the business. That would destroy Melbourne, Plam Bay, Rochester, Greenville, and Rockwall plus more.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @371+1km1rczq7

@cy Speaking of, she was let go

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @2dh+1km1rczq7

It would seem we are on the same trajectory as boeing. The greed and micromanagement is high. I say AI can replace all vps and board members and not get stock options, nor large salaries. Maybe then my meager raises could inflate.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @26a+1km1rczq7

Just take a lot at "leadership" background of the executives and the board. Good luck finding engineers and innovators. Its nearly all lawyers, accountants, hedge funders, and people from operations companies making tires, windows, doors, and air conditioners. Power companies and airline operatiins rounds it out.

High Tech, defense, aerospace, or any trusted disruptors? Nope.

Now you see why things continue to operate the way they do. Might as well go back to making a printing press.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @14x+1km1rczq7

@ap AI would probably make better decisions and know more about whats going on then some of the leaders left over after the last restructuring.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @12n+1km1rczq7

@c0 best of both? Try make L3 work like Harris! They are not the best at anything. Struggling to keep up, struggling to keep people.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @12m+1km1rczq7

Just a money machine for investors. Not a trusted "anything". Not a good place to work for anyone who wants stability and a long term profession.
Don't hang on to a ghost. It's dead.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @g8+1km1rczq7

@c2 -“#FailedDisruptor”. Spot on. I like that.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @ew+1km1rczq7

@ct CK pushed previous CIO to outsource, so they started with the help desk. It backfired and resulted in an absolute chaotic disaster. After how bad that went, she couldn’t move forward with the pressure to keep outsourcing. This new CIO was brought on to “”finish”” the “”job”” and the 3 other VP’s that were a part of the massacre wiped their hands clean and laughed themselves over to new CIO positions

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @cy+1km1rczq7

@cb If she could outsource all of IT (even IT security) she would do it in a heartbeat to “save” money.

#Joke

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @cx+1km1rczq7

@cb

Rumor has it the CIO before Kim left due to her opposition to outsourcing IT.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @ct+1km1rczq7

@c2 - You are 100% correct. I think the only reason Kim M. got hired as CIO is probably because she promised to outsource as much of IT as she could when she interviewed for the job (and we all know how that is going). A job, BTW, which must not have been too appealing since the woman who had the position before her bailed after what - maybe a year?

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @cb+1km1rczq7

IT could use a case study too. CIO completely destroyed IT and all the management chain are all clowns who drink her useless kool-Aid. How many times do you need to outsource to different companies and pour hundreds of millions down the drain to make up for your sc--w up?

#FailedDisrupter

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @c2+1km1rczq7

Might end up being a good business case study of what can go wrong when you take two good companies that have different operating styles and cultures and try to merge them by taking the best of both. Then pile on a large acquisition. Hopefully it works out but at this point doesn't seem to likely.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @c0+1km1rczq7

Bro, just wait til L3Mehta gets promoted to President of MSL as well. Then why not CEO, CFO and COO too. Get rid of all managers and AI is the overlord. 1 layer org chart. Why not.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @ap+1km1rczq7

Post a reply

: