Managers? Directors? Sr. Directors? VPs?
7 replies (most recent on top)
@cr there’s definitely compliance they have to demonstrate, including WARN act requirements if they meet the layoff thresholds.
@cr Just a reminder that if you are in a protected class (over 40), you should look into what your protections are, and what you should do differently when receiving a severance (compared to someone under 40) or being dismissed or placed on a PIP. HR is never your friend.
@ck For everyone in MN, it's an at-will state so I don't know what, if any, compliance they have to justify. As long as they can show they're not intentionally laying someone off because they're in a protected class...
@cb I think they may be required to disclose SOMETHING to show they’re legally compliant. Otherwise there’d be a ton of termination without cause lawsuits.
After surviving all previous RIF’s, as far as I know, no one really knows the criteria or they sign a NDA preventing them from disclosing.
@bx Do you really think consultants get to the level of individuals? My understanding is they essentially say, “Cut 12 jobs from this area due to A, B, & C,” and Target decides who.
Consulting firm.
Joking not joking..