Thread regarding Verizon Communications Inc. layoffs

The "New Norm" of Working @Verizon |Telecom Industry & Corporate America

It's not fun whatsoever to watch coworkers, friends and/or family loose their livelihood. I know many at Verizon who've been going thru this round of layoffs turmoil, and amongst them some who lost their jobs. It's very hard watching people you know suffer, however it is a reality of working at large corporations.

Honestly, it's something you inadvertently sign up for when you take a corporate position, especially in the Telecommunications industry which has regularly had staff cutbacks for nearly ~45 years beginning with the breakup the AT&T Bell System in 1982.

I've worked in Telecom (AT&T, Verizon, Virgin Mobile, Sprint, T-Mobile and Boost) since the mid-1980's and have been thru major rounds of layoffs literally dozens of times (impacted 1 time personally when AT&T shut down their entire Consumer Business in 2003) so I can certainly emphasize with others enduring the same.

This could well be Verizon's "new norm" going forward (also Telcom & Corp America) with AI, automation and operational changes significantly take hold.

P.s., I've previously worked closely with Verizon's CEO, Dan Schulman at AT&T and Virgin Mobile over the years. He's a good Executive doing what's necessary to right Verizon's lagging performance.


by
| 2314 views | | 15 replies (last November 24) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+1kas1xtqs

15 replies (most recent on top)

@OP I'd much rather loose my livelihood than lose it

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @e7+1kas1xtqs

@bt - Bro was point'in to New Normal Verizon not luv & kisses to CEO gone wild with cutz!

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @dz+1kas1xtqs

@bt LOL

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @bw+1kas1xtqs

Did one of Dan's friends/new hires come here to post this love letter to him?

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @bt+1kas1xtqs

Corporations restructure, but we cannot compare what is happening today to 30, 40 years ago.

  • There was no laying off Americans, and offshoring their roles to cheaper labor countries.

  • Yes company has the right to restructure, but you tell that AI is the reason to cut 1000s of critical roles .. but instead of using Agentic AI to help CEO, he brings in a human to help. The words and the actions do not match.

  • Secondly, its a telecom network - eliminating network, operations engineers, technicians makes zero sense when the number of sites and technologies are constantly evolving and increasing. Is AI going to go in field and resolve site issues?

  • Everyone knows about corruption Shankr has done, yet he is there.
    Why did they not cut executive roles that do not follow process but rather only promote nepotism in their departments

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @b7+1kas1xtqs

@OP it’s the reality of ANY job. Small, medium, and large. Do a good job, invest your money, especially the free money Verizon was giving you, save for a rainy day, and continue to develop your own skills using the resources the company has to offer. Don’t just come here to cry about it.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @ar+1kas1xtqs

"Cuts in some departments were not strategic at all." @a5

..unless, your strategy is sabotage. @af
or, short term personal enrichment

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @aj+1kas1xtqs

"...so I can certainly emphasize with others enduring the same...." - OP
Stop trying to sound smart. btw, it's empathize you pretentious dummy.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @ah+1kas1xtqs

@af it was not surgical. It was a hatchet job. Quick way to put some dollars in Dan’s pocket.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @ag+1kas1xtqs

"Cuts in some departments were not strategic at all." @a5

..unless, your strategy is sabotage.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @af+1kas1xtqs

@OP Second liner in New Jersey here... Are you trying to tell me Verizon had a rif?... I was unaware... Thank goodness they haven't found out about me yet!

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @ae+1kas1xtqs

...or, lose it, OP

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @ac+1kas1xtqs

If that was the case, top brass would go first. Cuts in some departments were not strategic at all.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @a5+1kas1xtqs

Dan the Hatchet Man is financially incentivized to conduct mass layoffs. He’s going to personally pocket more than $50 MILLION while thousands upon thousands of families have to worry about putting food on the table. It’s so immoral and unethical it should be illegal.

No doubt Verizon needs to rethink its strategy. The increasing price hikes were a bad move in a competitive marketplace. But I can’t help but feel truly there must’ve been another way? Seems like this mass layoff was a shortcut to reducing company expenses, for a temporary hike in shareholder value, so Dan can become even richer.

But there are other costs … such as plummeting employee engagement and “quiet quitting” among those who survived. Looking at LinkedIn comments, public sentiment about this mass layoff has been vastly critical and negative

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @a4+1kas1xtqs

Post a reply

: