Thread regarding Nike Inc. layoffs

Nike Execs “Decline” PSP Payout – Don’t Be Fooled by the Feel-Good PR Spin

Nike’s senior leadership, led by Elliott Hill, made a very public announcement: “We will not be accepting our 54% Performance Sharing Plan (PSP) payout.” And like clockwork, here came the applause:
“That’s real leadership.”
“Wow, such sacrifice!”
“They’re really setting the tone!”

Let’s cut the act. This wasn’t a sacrifice. It was a PR performance. A feel-good distraction meant to pacify the masses while keeping the corporate machine rolling smooth at the top.
What PSP Really Stood For: Forget “Performance Sharing Plan.”
This was nothing more than: Pretty Safe Paycheck – They turned down one piece of the pie while still collecting guaranteed base salaries, stock payouts, and elite perks that keep them in the luxury lane. They didn’t “lose” anything.
Posturing Saves Prestige – It looked good. It played well. It bought headlines and silenced questions. That’s it. Don’t confuse posturing with principle.

What They Still Took Home: Don’t let them fool you. They still bagged:
• High six- or seven-figure base salaries
• Stock awards from past years still vesting
• Additional performance bonuses outside this plan
• All the executive perks — travel stipends, wellness funds, financial advisors
• Exit packages that make falling upward a whole damn career strategy
They walked away from the one thing they could afford to not take — because they knew the illusion was more valuable than the check.

Who Took the Real Loss? Not them.
It was:
• Production workers grinding on the line
• Distribution teammates moving freight through heat, cold, and chaos
• Retail associates hustling under pressure with fewer resources
• Support and service staff who keep the system running, often in the shadows
For us, a 54% cut is the difference between staying above water and sinking.

Stop Drinking the Kool-Aid

Let’s stop acting like this was heroic. This wasn’t humility. It was PR chess. Elliott Hill isn’t limping through adversity — he’s managing perception. And y’all out here clapping like you got a raise. Wake up. They didn’t take a loss — they took the spotlight.

Here’s a Thought: Just Give Equal Bonuses: No more shell games. No smoke and mirrors. No “percent of target payout” math problems.

If you really want to show respect to the workforce? Just give straight, equal bonuses across the board.You get $10,000? Then I get $10,000.
Period.

Stop with the “Kansas City Shuffle” — where you look left and the money moves right.
This ain’t magic. It’s theft disguised as tiered incentive structures.

Bottom Line: They didn’t decline the PSP — they rebranded it.
From “Performance Sharing Plan” to a Pretty Safe Paycheck and a masterclass in Posturing that Saves Prestige.

It was never about sharing. It was about shielding. It was never about us. It was always about image.

If you’re still clapping? You’re clapping for crumbs while they eat steak behind tinted windows.

We see it. We’re tired of it. And no press release/stage performance is gonna change that.

by
| 3522 views | | 12 replies (last July 14) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+1k01g3ydk

12 replies (most recent on top)

@b9 fool

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @gt+1k01g3ydk

Execs are basically paid in stock. Stock doesn’t go up, they don’t make money. If stock goes down they essentially are bleeding money. They’re limited to when they can sell due to insider trading protocols.

Sure, the PSP isn’t their top income bringer but they’re still getting slick 100k even when we’re down. Regardless it’s a good jester, Mark Parker did the same thing when we were in the cr-pper back in 2017. I didn’t see any negative posts on here back then.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @gr+1k01g3ydk

The thing is execs get a full bonus regardless of what the rest of the work force gets. At least at a VP level.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @gh+1k01g3ydk

This ChatGPT attempt to give a bad take on a bold move is comical. Nice try OP. Typical never good enough. If they took $0 salary for a year you would have AI write about how they could because their last year salary was so high or other BS glass half empty view.

People see through you on this not through them for not taking the bonus. Kudos to them. Other companies and even past leaders here in bad times still would take their money. Recognize effort when you see it because clearly if you really work at Nike you don’t give any effort.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @fa+1k01g3ydk

Bitter much, OP? A bonus is just that, an extra. Nike is not contractually obligated to pay employees a bonus.
As for the so called posturing, EH and LT could just as easily have dipped into the trough. Maybe someone in HR has the math on how much this would've reduced rank and file bonus by if they had taken their share.
As for executive compensation being way out of whack, yes that's true regardless. Another reason for gross inequalities in America.
I'm no kool aid drinker, but why trash talk a good thing.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @cw+1k01g3ydk

@ba best post on this thread! Nailed it.

Post more.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @ct+1k01g3ydk

Tell me you don’t understand how comp works without telling me….

Not a perfect system for sure, but you want the same bonus structure across the board regardless of responsibility? Yeah, ok.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @cd+1k01g3ydk

Would have prefer to see them redistribute to the rank and file rather than refuse.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @bm+1k01g3ydk

ChatGPT much?

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @bg+1k01g3ydk

Take a salary cut, senior leaders. A big one.
Then, decline to do layoffs and let the peeps doing the work decide how to redistribute and take a salary cut too, so peeps with little ones aren't losing their jobs.

When your salary is $30 mil, declining a bonus is mere posturing. It's insulting.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @bf+1k01g3ydk

This whole post could have been two bullets:

  • They walked away from the one thing they could afford to not take — because they knew the illusion was more valuable than the check.
  • If you really want to show respect to the workforce? Just give straight, equal bonuses across the board.You get $10,000? Then I get $10,000. Period.
by
| | Reply
Post ID: @ba+1k01g3ydk

Which GPT tool wrote this?

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @b9+1k01g3ydk

Post a reply

: