Thread regarding Chevron Corp. layoffs

Revenue per Employee: show me the money.

Just a reminder that, even before these layoffs, Chevron has the 4th highest revenue per employee out of the Fortune 50. It beats Microsoft, Meta, Apple, Google, GM and Amazon.

Without considering the costs of ENGINE and redundancies, reducing Chevron's employee count by 20% results in a ~1% reduction in total operating expenses.

Destabilizing the company for a 1% reduction in costs?

And do we really think this mayhem isn't going to cost us in production and revenue?

I'm not sure employee headcount is Chevron's biggest problem - this is the best they've got?

AmerisourceBergen (Cencora)
Revenue: $238.6B
Employees: 22,000 (Rank 20)
Revenue per Employee: $10,845,455
Market Cap: $59.8B (Rank 50)

McKesson
Revenue: $276.7B
Employees: 48,000 (Rank 19)
Revenue per Employee: $5,764,583
Market Cap: $101B (Rank 34)

ExxonMobil
Revenue: $344.6B
Employees: 61,500 (Rank 18)
Revenue per Employee: $5,602,439
Market Cap: $436B (Rank 9)

Chevron
Revenue: $246.3B
Employees: 43,846 (Rank 21)
Revenue per Employee: $5,617,095
Market Cap: $296B (Rank 15)

Cardinal Health
Revenue: $181.4B
Employees: 46,035 (Rank 20)
Revenue per Employee: $3,941,184
Market Cap: $44B (Rank 60)

Cigna
Revenue: $180.5B
Employees: 73,800 (Rank 17)
Revenue per Employee: $2,446,211
Market Cap: $91B (Rank 38)

Apple
Revenue: $383.5B
Employees: 161,000 (Rank 12)
Revenue per Employee: $2,383,230
Market Cap: $3.28T (Rank 1)

Alphabet (Google)
Revenue: $307.4B
Employees: 182,502 (Rank 11)
Revenue per Employee: $1,684,296
Market Cap: $1.87T (Rank 3)

CVS Health
Revenue: $357.8B
Employees: 259,500 (Rank 7)
Revenue per Employee: $1,378,034
Market Cap: $83B (Rank 40)

AT&T
Revenue: $168.9B
Employees: 160,700 (Rank 13)
Revenue per Employee: $1,051,000
Market Cap: $193B (Rank 20)

UnitedHealth Group
Revenue: $371.6B
Employees: 440,000 (Rank 5)
Revenue per Employee: $844,545
Market Cap: $280B (Rank 16)

Berkshire Hathaway
Revenue: $364.5B
Employees: 396,500 (Rank 6)
Revenue per Employee: $919,113
Market Cap: $700B (Rank 5)

General Motors
Revenue: $156.7B
Employees: 167,000 (Rank 10)
Revenue per Employee: $938,323
Market Cap: $77B (Rank 42)

Ford Motor
Revenue: $158.1B
Employees: 173,000 (Rank 9)
Revenue per Employee: $913,294
Market Cap: $47B (Rank 58)

Costco Wholesale
Revenue: $242.3B
Employees: 316,000 (Rank 4)
Revenue per Employee: $766,139
Market Cap: $430B (Rank 10)

JPMorgan Chase
Revenue: $132.9B
Employees: 293,723 (Rank 5)
Revenue per Employee: $452,492
Market Cap: $830B (Rank 4)

Walgreens Boots Alliance
Revenue: $132.7B
Employees: 325,000 (Rank 3)
Revenue per Employee: $408,308
Market Cap: $38B (Rank 65)

Amazon
Revenue: $574.8B
Employees: 1,525,000 (Rank 2)
Revenue per Employee: $376,000
Market Cap: $2.35T (Rank 2)

Home Depot
Revenue: $157.4B
Employees: 500,000 (Rank 1)
Revenue per Employee: $314,800
Market Cap: $380B (Rank 12)

Walmart
Revenue: $648.1B
Employees: 2,100,000 (Rank 1)
Revenue per Employee: $308,619
Market Cap: $510B (Rank 7)

by
| 2883 views | | 13 replies (last July 17) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+1jzxak5z7

13 replies (most recent on top)

@br+1jzxak5z7
I agree there are ways to increase productivity without layoffs. However, the management team does manage the people effectivity and that is why so few valuable ideas are captured and developed. After 15+ years at Chevron, I realize the management teams manage up and only perform the work that their upper managers create and ask for. They do not analyze the data points to make improvements and certainly do not want ideas from the employees to muck up the work they are reporting on in the Power BI reports and PowerPoint slide decks. I am counting the days until i can retire and hopefully the next layoff will sink up with my retirement plans. I like how some people have retired with 6+ months severance and unemployment insurance. Ka Ching!

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @11p+1jzxak5z7

@a6 in the DM&C Townhall, AW said it appears our benchmark metrics may already be improving!
Somehow seems to lack the insight that today’s metrics are a result of “yesterday’s” efforts (and the old organization). The 2nd and 3rd quarter productivity are likely to be generational minimum for Chevron.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @11j+1jzxak5z7

Yeah well I know one that doesn’t do jack nothing. Hasn’t contributed anything all year. Literally. Zero return on investment. Yet somehow got a job in the reorg. HOW

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @c1+1jzxak5z7

@b8, layoffs will only reduce costs by 1-2%. That’s not nothing, but only if the reduction in workforce doesn’t have more severe ramifications and become counterproductive.

What would be better is using those people to find savings far greater than those realized from layoffs, and finding ways to grow the business and increase revenue.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @br+1jzxak5z7

What a silly metric that proves absolutely nothing on its own. Profitability, industry, growth cycle, etc. SO many factors to normalize for...

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @bm+1jzxak5z7

Revenue is great but Income and Cash Flow are what matter and those come after Expenses are subtracted. Layoffs reduce expenses and thus increase income/profit/cashflow overall, per employee and per barrel.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @b8+1jzxak5z7

@ak SOUNDS LIKE YOU JUST VOLUNTEERED PAL! THANK YOU!!
SO WHEN CAN WE EXPECT YOUR COMMUNICATION???? REAL QUESTION...

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @ay+1jzxak5z7

Or the CES....

This feedback has been given in every way possible, including town halls.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @ar+1jzxak5z7

I’m tired of reading this in an anonymous forum. When is someone going to have the ba--s to send a company wide email or ask a straightforward question at a live town hall. No one wants to jeopardize their personal life but complain all day in an anonymous forum.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @ak+1jzxak5z7

That good on the surface, but vast majority of that revenue comes from fields and investments made decades ago which are simply being maintained by the current workforce. Those numbers are generally not the result of current actions.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @af+1jzxak5z7

This is good, and we are doing OK compared to everyone but Exxon. I included profit below. Basically leaders decided that the only thing they know how to do is reduce the cost per employee, those ELT numb-nuts haven't really considered anything beyond that and platitudes about being more direct....

ExxonMobil
Revenue: $349.6B
Employees: 60,900 (Rank ~35)
Revenue per Employee: $5,741,541
Profit per Employee: $553,363
Market Cap: ~$500B (Rank ~10)
Sources: ExxonMobil FY 2024 Earnings Release, 2023 Annual Report

Chevron
Revenue: $193.4B
Employees: 45,298 (Rank ~45)
Revenue per Employee: $4,270,879
Profit per Employee: $390,885
Market Cap: ~$280B (Rank ~25)
Sources: Chevron FY 2024 Earnings Release, 2023 Annual Report

Shell
Revenue: $284.3B
Employees: 98,000 (Rank ~20)
Revenue per Employee: $2,900,000
Profit per Employee: $168,367
Market Cap: ~$215B (Rank ~30)
Sources: Shell Q4 2024 Results, Shell 2023 Sustainability Report

BP
Revenue: $189.2B
Employees: 100,500 (Rank ~18)
Revenue per Employee: $1,882,089
Profit per Employee: $12,238
Market Cap: ~$100B (Rank ~60)
Sources: BP FY 2024 Results, BP 2023 Annual Report

TotalEnergies
Revenue: $195.6B
Employees: 102,887 (Rank ~17)
Revenue per Employee: $1,900,478
Profit per Employee: $153,229
Market Cap: ~$160B (Rank ~40)
Sources: TotalEnergies FY 2024 Results, 2023 URD

Occidental Petroleum (Oxy)
Revenue: $26.9B
Employees: 13,323 (Rank ~90)
Revenue per Employee: $2,019,294
Profit per Employee: $177,172
Market Cap: ~$57B (Rank ~65)
Sources: Macrotrends (2024 Est.), Occidental 2023 10-K

Revenue: Total annual sales. Shows company size and business volume.

Employees: Number of full-time employees at year-end. Indicates operational scale.
(Rank): Company’s position by workforce size among oil & gas firms. Lower rank = larger workforce.

Revenue per Employee: Revenue divided by number of employees. A proxy for productivity.

Profit per Employee: Net income divided by number of employees. Reflects efficiency in generating profit.

Market Cap: Total value of all outstanding shares. Measures perceived value and market size.
(Rank): Approximate global position by market cap. Lower rank = higher valuation.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @a9+1jzxak5z7

Now this is the content I’m here for.

Everything CVX is going through is the very definition of a “manufactured crisis”. All to prop up current management’s ego and level of compensation.

And the sheer amount of weakness and deference in those PSG 26 and above is staggering.

The price will certainly be paid for in the long run, I just hope it doesn’t end up costing more lives than it already has.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @a6+1jzxak5z7

Interesting data. We have almost the same revenue/employee ratio as Exxon.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @a5+1jzxak5z7

Post a reply

: