Thread regarding Walgreens layoffs

No merit increase

Sycamore is mandating a four-day commute to Deerfield starting in February, which significantly increases out-of-pocket costs for employees, especially those who commuted to OPO previously. Yet, despite 3% inflation over the past year, salaries are not being adjusted - not even to cover a basic cost-of-living increase. What a slap in the face


by
| 5011 views | | 25 replies (last November 24) | Reply
Post ID: @OP+1k8rtt0dg

25 replies (most recent on top)

They “calibrate” performance review scores before they are made official to you and downgrade scores if the total group doesn’t fit a bell curve. You are “ranked” by popularity. Managers are forced to change scores and to make up stuff up about you as partially achieving to justify the score change. They put you as low as possible and then announce the scores that will get raises. The cards are heavily stacked against you.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @3w1+1k8rtt0dg

every few weeks they announce something new to get people to leave. It’s unfortunately nothing surprising at this point.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @kq+1k8rtt0dg

@f0 Seems like a troll post.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @h6+1k8rtt0dg

Any bonus eligible support office team members (which is probably 97% of them) will not be getting a merit increase. It does not matter your performance review score.

0.0%.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @h4+1k8rtt0dg

@er What's your source for that information? Or are you just guessing?

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @f0+1k8rtt0dg

@dq They are supposed to layoff anyone that got a 2.9 and less in Jan.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @er+1k8rtt0dg

@dx I’ve heard this as well. It’s easier to do layoffs if you’ve identified low performers through performance management. It provides rationale. Be prepared if you were on the target list for a reduction in your overall performance review rating.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @ep+1k8rtt0dg

@bd While that may be true for managers and above, for individual contributors with a 5% bonus target, the “extra bonus” doesn’t equate. Especially given future increases will be based on a lower salary

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @ec+1k8rtt0dg

@dq I received a 3.5 (lowered like everyone else's) and didn't get a increase. Don't think they lowered scores so we wouldn't get the increase but sounds like their way of having a reason to let people go when they do another round of layoffs. Although Im not counting on my 3.5 keep me around if they need to cut costs. Definitely looking.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @dx+1k8rtt0dg

@dj My performance was FINE!!! My boss put a bunch of trivial things on my performance review to make it sound like I was incompetent. It was all ridiculous stuff.
If you read the other post, you will see that many people had their performance reviews dropped to 2.9 recently.
It's all a scam to avoid giving people merit increases. This company is beyond unethical.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @dq+1k8rtt0dg

And what is the C suite taking?

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @dn+1k8rtt0dg

@dg Hey 2.9 is not even Satisfactory. Places I worked in the past if you were improvement needed you did not get a raise. If you don't meet the job requirements why would you think a raise is supposed to happen?

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @dj+1k8rtt0dg

I received a 2.9 performance rating and NO merit increase for the first time in my entire career with ANY company.
I am beyond disgusted. My performance was absolutely fine. This was done to either save the rich people money or to encourage me to leave.
Trust me, I will be out of here as soon as I find another job! Such a toxic place. Pathetic.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @dg+1k8rtt0dg

@b0 only people that are not bonus eligible get a raise

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @d9+1k8rtt0dg

@b7 Not disagreeing with you on your assessment of Sycamore but Walgreens "leadership" had lost its ability to stand up to the likes of Sycamore long ago. As The Wall Street Journal put it, Walgreens went from being a $100 billion healthcare company to a salvage project. Sad state of affairs.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @d4+1k8rtt0dg

@b0 Gotta 3. I figure “3” is the go to performance rating. With 3 just meeting standards, it gives management the option of giving zero raise or tossing out a few crumbs if they’re feeling generous. With the new found prosperity that my 2% raise affords me, I may be able to treat myself to McDonald’s 1.5 times a week if I choose my menu items wisely!

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @cy+1k8rtt0dg

Don’t be daft lad, the bonus payout this year eclipses the gains you’d get from the usual 2% merit raise.

And the only way we’re sticking to 4 wonderful wilmot days is if total headcount gets slashed another 20% or so before Feb. Revert to 3 days otherwise. 0 expense doing that. Expanding space to accommodate current count at 4 days, let alone the same says, is too costly

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @bd+1k8rtt0dg

Sycamore is absolute sc-m and the fact that WAG leadership didn’t stand up for us is even worse.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @b7+1k8rtt0dg

@an To the person who got a 2% raise, what was your Performance Rating?

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @b0+1k8rtt0dg

@ar I work for the call center and got a 3.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @as+1k8rtt0dg

@an Do you work in store or HQ? Did you get a good score?

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @ar+1k8rtt0dg

@ae I got a 2% raise. Life-changing! Who says Sycamore doesn't care about its employees?

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @an+1k8rtt0dg

PE companies do not give a hoot about employees. They solely exist to make money for themselves. Period. Humans mean NOTHING. Performance means NOTHING. The only thing that matters is the BOTTOM LINE.
And they took us private so they don't have to answer to a BOD. They can be as nasty and greedy as they want and no one can stop them.
I knew things were going to get bad as soon as the whole Sycamore situation was announced. Just more horrible, selfish ultra-rich people stepping on the normal folk as usual.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @ah+1k8rtt0dg

@OP what a freaking joke! No support office bonuses when we’ve hit targets, working capital goals, etc.

Sycamore and the company is complete garbage and do not care about their talent.

by
| | Reply
Post ID: @ae+1k8rtt0dg

Post a reply

: